From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 832FF900086 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:21:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.36 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:21:30 +0200 From: "azurIt" References: <1302178426.3357.34.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1302190586.3357.45.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110412154906.70829d60.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110412183132.a854bffc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1302662256.2811.27.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110413141600.28793661.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110414102501.GE11871@csn.ul.ie> <20110415115903.315DEAA1@pobox.sk> <20110415104700.GD22688@suse.de> <20110415125651.68156745@pobox.sk> <1302866247.12428.25.camel@machina.109elm.lan> <20110415133644.12504ADB@pobox.sk> <1302872460.12428.27.camel@machina.109elm.lan> In-Reply-To: <1302872460.12428.27.camel@machina.109elm.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20110415152130.AECAA367@pobox.sk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Andrew Morton , Eric Dumazet , Changli Gao , Am?rico Wang , Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby So it's really not necessary ? It would be better for us if you can go without it cos it means to run buggy kernel for one more day. Which kernel versions will include this fix ? Thank you very much! azur ______________________________________________________________ > Od: "Mel Gorman" > Komu: azurIt > DA!tum: 15.04.2011 15:01 > Predmet: Re: Regression from 2.6.36 > > CC: "Andrew Morton" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Changli Gao" , "Am?rico Wang" , "Jiri Slaby" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Jiri Slaby" >On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 13:36 +0200, azurIt wrote: >> sysfs was already mounted: >> >> # mount >> sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) >> >> >> I have enabled all of the options you suggested and also CONFIG_DEBUG_FS ;) I will boot new kernel this night. Hope it won't degraded performance much.. >> > >It's only for curiousity's sake. As you report the patch fixes the >problem, it matches the theory that it's allocator latency. The script >would confirm it for sure, but it's not a high priority. > >-- >Mel Gorman >SUSE Labs > > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org