Re: [PATCH 1/4] vmscan: all_unreclaimable() use zone->all_unreclaimable as a name

[KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Hi

> > The above says "Eventually, oom-killer never works". Is this no enough?
> > The above says
> >   1) current logic have a race
> >   2) x86 increase a chance of the race by dma zone
> >   3) if race is happen, oom killer don't work
> 
> And the system hangs up, so it's a local DoS and I guess we should
> backport the fix into -stable.  I added this:
> 
> : This resulted in the kernel hanging up when executing a loop of the form
> : 
> : 1. fork
> : 2. mmap
> : 3. touch memory
> : 4. read memory
> : 5. munmmap
> : 
> : as described in
> : http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1348725#1348725
> 
> And the problems which the other patches in this series address are
> pretty deadly as well.  Should we backport everything?

patch [1/4] and [2/4] should be backported because they are regression fix.
But [3/4] and [4/4] are on borderline to me. they improve a recovery time 
from oom. some times it is very important, some times not. And it is not
regression fix. Our oom-killer is very weak from forkbomb attack since
very old days.

Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>