From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] memcg: give current access to memory reserves if it's trying to die
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:58:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110318145817.b15f91ae.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110317221758.5e8e78d0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:17:58 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:35:34 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:53:19 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Was it deliberate that mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() ignores the oom
> > > notifier callbacks?
> > >
> >
> > I'm not sure for what purpose notifier chain for oom exists.
> > At a loock, it's for s390/powerpc Collaborative Memory Manager.. ?
>
> commit 8bc719d3cab8414938f9ea6e33b58d8810d18068
> Author: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> AuthorDate: Mon Sep 25 23:31:20 2006 -0700
> Commit: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
> CommitDate: Tue Sep 26 08:48:47 2006 -0700
>
> [PATCH] out of memory notifier
>
> Add a notifer chain to the out of memory killer. If one of the registered
> callbacks could release some memory, do not kill the process but return and
> retry the allocation that forced the oom killer to run.
>
> The purpose of the notifier is to add a safety net in the presence of
> memory ballooners. If the resource manager inflated the balloon to a size
> where memory allocations can not be satisfied anymore, it is better to
> deflate the balloon a bit instead of killing processes.
>
> The implementation for the s390 ballooner is included.
>
> > About memcg, notifier to userland already exists and I though I don't
> > need to call CMM callbacks (for now, there is no user with memcg, I guess.)
>
> Seems to me that the callback should be performed.
>
Hmm, (for now) memory cgroup just handles user's memory, so any kernel
callback cannot do anything..other than dropping file cache if some
module pins it.
> Or, perhaps, migrate it over to use the shrinker stuff, along with
> suitable handling of the scanning priority.
>
Ah, yes. callback at oom is too late, I think.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-18 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-08 0:24 [patch] memcg: add oom killer delay David Rientjes
2011-02-08 1:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-08 2:13 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-08 2:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-08 2:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-08 2:37 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-08 10:25 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-09 22:19 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-10 0:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-16 3:15 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-20 22:19 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-23 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-24 0:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-24 0:51 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-03 20:11 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-03 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08 0:12 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 0:29 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08 0:36 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 0:51 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08 1:02 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08 1:33 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 2:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08 3:07 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 3:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08 3:56 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 4:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08 5:30 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 5:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08 23:49 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-09 6:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-09 6:44 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-09 7:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-09 21:12 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-09 21:27 ` [patch] memcg: give current access to memory reserves if it's trying to die David Rientjes
2011-03-09 23:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-17 23:37 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-17 23:53 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-18 4:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-18 5:17 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-18 5:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-03-18 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-18 20:32 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 3:06 ` [patch] memcg: add oom killer delay KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110318145817.b15f91ae.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox