From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7AE8D0039 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 00:50:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.71]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D41E3EE0C5 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:50:14 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail (m1 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547C945DE5A for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:50:14 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.91]) by m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2BA45DE56 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:50:14 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D758E08002 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:50:14 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.240.81.134]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30981DB8049 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:50:13 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:43:53 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check zone->all_unreclaimable in all_unreclaimable() Message-Id: <20110309144353.387d946e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20110309143704.194e8ee1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1299325456-2687-1-git-send-email-avagin@openvz.org> <20110305152056.GA1918@barrios-desktop> <4D72580D.4000208@gmail.com> <20110305155316.GB1918@barrios-desktop> <4D7267B6.6020406@gmail.com> <20110305170759.GC1918@barrios-desktop> <20110307135831.9e0d7eaa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110309143704.194e8ee1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , Andrew Vagin , Andrey Vagin , Mel Gorman , KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:37:04 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:45:51 +0900 > Minchan Kim wrote: > Hmm, should I support a sacrifice feature 'some signal(SIGINT?) will be sent by > the kernel when it detects system memory is in short' in cgroup ? > (For example, if full LRU scan is done in a zone, notifier > works and SIGINT will be sent.) > Sorry, this sounds like "mem_notify" ;), Kosaki-san's old work. I think functionality for "mem_notify" will have no obstacle opinion but implementation detail is a problem....Shouldn't we try it again ? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org