From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: fix leak on wrong LRU with FUSE
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:18:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110308181832.6386da5f.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110308135612.e971e1f3.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:56:12 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> fs/fuse/dev.c::fuse_try_move_page() does
>
> (1) remove a page by ->steal()
> (2) re-add the page to page cache
> (3) link the page to LRU if it was not on LRU at (1)
>
> This implies the page is _on_ LRU when it's added to radix-tree.
> So, the page is added to memory cgroup while it's on LRU.
> because LRU is lazy and no one flushs it.
>
> This is the same behavior as SwapCache and needs special care as
> - remove page from LRU before overwrite pc->mem_cgroup.
> - add page to LRU after overwrite pc->mem_cgroup.
>
> And we need to taking care of pagevec.
>
> If PageLRU(page) is set before we add PCG_USED bit, the page
> will not be added to memcg's LRU (in short period).
> So, regardlress of PageLRU(page) value before commit_charge(),
> we need to check PageLRU(page) after commit_charge().
>
> Changelog:
> - clean up.
> - cover !PageLRU() by pagevec case.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> Index: mmotm-0303/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-0303.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-0303/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -926,13 +926,12 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page
> }
>
> /*
> - * At handling SwapCache, pc->mem_cgroup may be changed while it's linked to
> - * lru because the page may.be reused after it's fully uncharged (because of
> - * SwapCache behavior).To handle that, unlink page_cgroup from LRU when charge
> - * it again. This function is only used to charge SwapCache. It's done under
> - * lock_page and expected that zone->lru_lock is never held.
> + * At handling SwapCache and other FUSE stuff, pc->mem_cgroup may be changed
> + * while it's linked to lru because the page may be reused after it's fully
> + * uncharged. To handle that, unlink page_cgroup from LRU when charge it again.
> + * It's done under lock_page and expected that zone->lru_lock isnever held.
> */
> -static void mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit_swapcache(struct page *page)
> +static void mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit(struct page *page)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> @@ -948,7 +947,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_co
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> }
>
> -static void mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_commit_swapcache(struct page *page)
> +static void mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_commit(struct page *page)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> @@ -2431,9 +2430,28 @@ static void
> __mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *ptr,
> enum charge_type ctype);
>
> +static void
> +__mem_cgroup_commit_charge_lrucare(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> + enum charge_type ctype)
> +{
> + struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> + /*
> + * In some case, SwapCache, FUSE(splice_buf->radixtree), the page
> + * is already on LRU. It means the page may on some other page_cgroup's
> + * LRU. Take care of it.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(PageLRU(page)))
> + mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit(page);
> + __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(mem, page, 1, pc, ctype);
> + if (unlikely(PageLRU(page)))
> + mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_commit(page);
> + return;
> +}
> +
> int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> + struct mem_cgroup *mem = NULL;
> int ret;
>
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> @@ -2468,14 +2486,15 @@ int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page
> if (unlikely(!mm))
> mm = &init_mm;
>
> - if (page_is_file_cache(page))
> - return mem_cgroup_charge_common(page, mm, gfp_mask,
> - MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE);
> -
> + if (page_is_file_cache(page)) {
> + ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(mm, gfp_mask, 1, &mem, true);
> + if (ret || !mem)
> + return ret;
> + __mem_cgroup_commit_charge_lrucare(page, mem,
> + MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE);
> + }
We should do "return 0" here, or do:
} else {
/* shmem */
if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
..
} else {
..
}
}
Otherwise, the page cache will be charged twice.
Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.
> /* shmem */
> if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
> - struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> -
> ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge_swapin(mm, page, gfp_mask, &mem);
> if (!ret)
> __mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(page, mem,
> @@ -2532,17 +2551,13 @@ static void
> __mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *ptr,
> enum charge_type ctype)
> {
> - struct page_cgroup *pc;
> -
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return;
> if (!ptr)
> return;
> cgroup_exclude_rmdir(&ptr->css);
> - pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> - mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit_swapcache(page);
> - __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(ptr, page, 1, pc, ctype);
> - mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_commit_swapcache(page);
> +
> + __mem_cgroup_commit_charge_lrucare(page, ptr, ctype);
> /*
> * Now swap is on-memory. This means this page may be
> * counted both as mem and swap....double count.
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-08 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-08 4:56 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08 9:18 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2011-03-09 6:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-09 7:48 ` [PATCH v3] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-09 10:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-03-09 23:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-10 5:47 ` [PATCH v4] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-10 6:04 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-03-10 22:20 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-10 23:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-11 0:01 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110308181832.6386da5f.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox