From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FEC8D0039 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:48:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:47:59 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: [PATCH] memsw: Deprecate noswapaccount kernel parameter and schedule it for removal Message-ID: <20110127104759.GA4301@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References: <20110126152158.GA4144@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110126140618.8e09cd23.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110127082320.GA15500@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110127180330.78585085.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110127092951.GA8036@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110127184827.a8927595.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110127184827.a8927595.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Daisuke Nishimura List-ID: On Thu 27-01-11 18:48:27, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > Could you try to write a patch for feature-removal-schedule.txt > and tries to remove noswapaccount and do clean up all ? > (And add warning to noswapaccount will be removed.....in 2.6.40) Sure, no problem. What do you think about the following patch? ---