From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: handle overflow in mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:40:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110127094031.04cc2be2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xr93y667lgdm.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:33:09 -0800
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> wrote:
> Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:29:15AM -0800, Greg Thelen wrote:
> >> mem_cgroup_get_limit() returns a byte limit as a unsigned 64 bit value,
> >> which is converted to a page count by mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(). Prior
> >> to this patch the conversion could overflow on 32 bit platforms
> >> yielding a limit of zero.
> >
> > Balbir: It can truncate, because the conversion shrinks the required
> > bits of this 64-bit number by only PAGE_SHIFT (12). Trying to store
> > the resulting up to 52 significant bits in a 32-bit integer will cut
> > up to 20 significant bits off.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
> >> ---
> >> mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> >> index 7dcca55..3fcac51 100644
> >> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> >> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> >> @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> >> struct task_struct *p;
> >>
> >> check_panic_on_oom(CONSTRAINT_MEMCG, gfp_mask, 0, NULL);
> >> - limit = mem_cgroup_get_limit(mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >> + limit = min(mem_cgroup_get_limit(mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT, (u64)ULONG_MAX);
> >
> > I would much prefer using min_t(u64, ...). To make it really, really
> > explicit that this is 64-bit arithmetic. But that is just me, no
> > correctness issue.
> >
> > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>
> I agree that min_t() is clearer. Does the following look better?
>
> Author: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
> Date: Wed Jan 26 00:05:59 2011 -0800
>
> oom: handle truncation in mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()
>
> mem_cgroup_get_limit() returns a byte limit as an unsigned 64 bit value.
> mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() converts this byte limit to an unsigned long
> page count. Prior to this patch, the 32 bit version of
> mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() would silently truncate the most significant
> 20 bits from byte limit when constructing the limit as a page count.
> For byte limits with the lowest 44 bits set to zero, this truncation
> would compute a page limit of zero.
>
> This patch checks for such large byte limits that cannot be converted to
> page counts without loosing information. In such situations, where a 32
> bit page counter is too small to represent the corresponding byte count,
> select a maximal page count.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 7dcca55..0164060 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> struct task_struct *p;
>
> check_panic_on_oom(CONSTRAINT_MEMCG, gfp_mask, 0, NULL);
> - limit = mem_cgroup_get_limit(mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + limit = min_t(u64, mem_cgroup_get_limit(mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT, ULONG_MAX);
> read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> retry:
> p = select_bad_process(&points, limit, mem, NULL);
>
Thank you for catching.
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-26 8:29 Greg Thelen
2011-01-26 13:40 ` Balbir Singh
2011-01-26 17:07 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-01-26 17:33 ` Greg Thelen
2011-01-26 18:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-01-26 20:32 ` Greg Thelen
2011-01-26 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-27 0:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 0:53 ` [BUGFIX] memcg: fix res_counter_read_u64 lock aware (Was " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 1:08 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-27 1:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 1:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 1:55 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-27 1:43 ` [BUGFIX v2] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 1:57 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-27 2:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 0:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110127094031.04cc2be2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox