From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 448A96B00E7 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:35:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.72]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1CA3EE0BD for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:35:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail (m2 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E305845DE61 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:35:22 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.92]) by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D7845DE68 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:35:22 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4A61DB803A for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:35:22 +0900 (JST) Received: from m106.s.css.fujitsu.com (m106.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.106]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC5C1DB8042 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:35:22 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:29:22 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] memcg : more fixes and clean up for 2.6.28-rc Message-Id: <20110124092922.0fb50ada.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20110121153431.191134dd.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20110121153431.191134dd.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "hannes@cmpxchg.org" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" List-ID: On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:34:31 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > This is a set of patches which I'm now testing, and it seems it passed > small test. So I post this. > > Some are bug fixes and other are clean ups but I think these are for 2.6.38. > > Brief decription > > [1/7] remove buggy comment and use better name for mem_cgroup_move_parent() > The fixes for mem_cgroup_move_parent() is already in mainline, this is > an add-on. > > [2/7] a bug fix for a new function mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(), > which was recently merged. > > [3/7] prepare for fixes in [4/7],[5/7]. This is an enhancement of function > which is used now. > > [4/7] fix mem_cgroup_charge() for THP. By this, memory cgroup's charge function > will handle THP request in sane way. > > [5/7] fix khugepaged scan condition for memcg. > This is a fix for hang of processes under small/buzy memory cgroup. > > [6/7] rename vairable names to be page_size, nr_pages, bytes rather than > ambiguous names. > > [7/7] some memcg function requires the caller to initialize variable > before call. It's ugly and fix it. > > > I think patch 1,2,3,4,5 is urgent ones. But I think patch "5" needs some > good review. But without "5", stress-test on small memory cgroup will not > run succesfully. > I'll rebase this set to onto http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=129559263207634&w=2 and post v2. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org