From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch rfc] memcg: correctly order reading PCG_USED and pc->mem_cgroup
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:06:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110120100654.a90d9cc6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110119120319.GA2232@cmpxchg.org>
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:03:19 +0100
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> The placement of the read-side barrier is confused: the writer first
> sets pc->mem_cgroup, then PCG_USED. The read-side barrier has to be
> between testing PCG_USED and reading pc->mem_cgroup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> I am a bit dumbfounded as to why this has never had any impact. I see
> two scenarios where charging can race with LRU operations:
>
> One is shmem pages on swapoff. They are on the LRU when charged as
> page cache, which could race with isolation/putback. This seems
> sufficiently rare.
>
> The other case is a swap cache page being charged while somebody else
> had it isolated. mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit_swapcache() would
> see the page isolated and skip it. The commit then has to race with
> putback, which could see PCG_USED but not pc->mem_cgroup, and crash
> with a NULL pointer dereference. This does sound a bit more likely.
>
> Any idea? Am I missing something?
>
I think troubles happen only when PCG_USED bit was found but pc->mem_cgroup
is NULL. Hmm.
set pc->mem_cgroup
write_barrier
set USED bit.
read_barrier
check USED bit
access pc->mem_cgroup
So, is there a case which only USED bit can be seen ?
Anyway, your patch is right.
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 5b562b3..db76ef7 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -836,13 +836,12 @@ void mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
> return;
>
> pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> - /*
> - * Used bit is set without atomic ops but after smp_wmb().
> - * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
> - */
> - smp_rmb();
> /* unused or root page is not rotated. */
> - if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc) || mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup))
> + if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> + return;
> + /* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
> + smp_rmb();
> + if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup))
> return;
> mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> list_move(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
> @@ -857,14 +856,10 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
> return;
> pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> VM_BUG_ON(PageCgroupAcctLRU(pc));
> - /*
> - * Used bit is set without atomic ops but after smp_wmb().
> - * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
> - */
> - smp_rmb();
> if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> return;
> -
> + /* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
> + smp_rmb();
> mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> /* huge page split is done under lru_lock. so, we have no races. */
> MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1 << compound_order(page);
> @@ -1031,14 +1026,10 @@ mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page(struct page *page)
> return NULL;
>
> pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> - /*
> - * Used bit is set without atomic ops but after smp_wmb().
> - * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
> - */
> - smp_rmb();
> if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> return NULL;
> -
> + /* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
> + smp_rmb();
> mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> if (!mz)
> return NULL;
> --
> 1.7.3.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-20 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-19 12:03 Johannes Weiner
2011-01-20 1:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-01-20 10:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-01-20 1:52 ` Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110120100654.a90d9cc6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox