From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch rfc] memcg: correctly order reading PCG_USED and pc->mem_cgroup
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:03:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110119120319.GA2232@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
The placement of the read-side barrier is confused: the writer first
sets pc->mem_cgroup, then PCG_USED. The read-side barrier has to be
between testing PCG_USED and reading pc->mem_cgroup.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
I am a bit dumbfounded as to why this has never had any impact. I see
two scenarios where charging can race with LRU operations:
One is shmem pages on swapoff. They are on the LRU when charged as
page cache, which could race with isolation/putback. This seems
sufficiently rare.
The other case is a swap cache page being charged while somebody else
had it isolated. mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit_swapcache() would
see the page isolated and skip it. The commit then has to race with
putback, which could see PCG_USED but not pc->mem_cgroup, and crash
with a NULL pointer dereference. This does sound a bit more likely.
Any idea? Am I missing something?
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 5b562b3..db76ef7 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -836,13 +836,12 @@ void mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
return;
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
- /*
- * Used bit is set without atomic ops but after smp_wmb().
- * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
- */
- smp_rmb();
/* unused or root page is not rotated. */
- if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc) || mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup))
+ if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
+ return;
+ /* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
+ smp_rmb();
+ if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup))
return;
mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
list_move(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
@@ -857,14 +856,10 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
return;
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
VM_BUG_ON(PageCgroupAcctLRU(pc));
- /*
- * Used bit is set without atomic ops but after smp_wmb().
- * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
- */
- smp_rmb();
if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
return;
-
+ /* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
+ smp_rmb();
mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
/* huge page split is done under lru_lock. so, we have no races. */
MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1 << compound_order(page);
@@ -1031,14 +1026,10 @@ mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page(struct page *page)
return NULL;
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
- /*
- * Used bit is set without atomic ops but after smp_wmb().
- * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
- */
- smp_rmb();
if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
return NULL;
-
+ /* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
+ smp_rmb();
mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
if (!mz)
return NULL;
--
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-19 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-19 12:03 Johannes Weiner [this message]
2011-01-20 1:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-20 10:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-01-20 1:52 ` Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110119120319.GA2232@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox