From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Divyesh Shah <dpshah@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch v3] memcg: add oom killer delay
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:41:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110104104130.a3faf0d5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012272228350.17843@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 22:29:05 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> Completely disabling the oom killer for a memcg is problematic if
> userspace is unable to address the condition itself, usually because it
> is unresponsive. This scenario creates a memcg deadlock: tasks are
> sitting in TASK_KILLABLE waiting for the limit to be increased, a task to
> exit or move, or the oom killer reenabled and userspace is unable to do
> so.
>
> An additional possible use case is to defer oom killing within a memcg
> for a set period of time, probably to prevent unnecessary kills due to
> temporary memory spikes, before allowing the kernel to handle the
> condition.
>
> This patch adds an oom killer delay so that a memcg may be configured to
> wait at least a pre-defined number of milliseconds before calling the oom
> killer. If the oom condition persists for this number of milliseconds,
> the oom killer will be called the next time the memory controller
> attempts to charge a page (and memory.oom_control is set to 0). This
> allows userspace to have a short period of time to respond to the
> condition before deferring to the kernel to kill a task.
>
> Admins may set the oom killer delay using the new interface:
>
> # echo 60000 > memory.oom_delay_millisecs
>
> This will defer oom killing to the kernel only after 60 seconds has
> elapsed. When setting memory.oom_delay, all pending delays have their
> charge retried and, if necessary, the new delay is then effected.
>
> The delay is cleared the first time the memcg is oom to avoid unnecessary
> waiting when userspace is unresponsive for future oom conditions. It may
> be set again using the above interface to enforce a delay on the next
> oom.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Changelog please.
> ---
> Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> index 7781857..e426733 100644
> --- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ Brief summary of control files.
> (See sysctl's vm.swappiness)
> memory.move_charge_at_immigrate # set/show controls of moving charges
> memory.oom_control # set/show oom controls.
> + memory.oom_delay_millisecs # set/show millisecs to wait before oom kill
>
> 1. History
>
> @@ -640,6 +641,31 @@ At reading, current status of OOM is shown.
> under_oom 0 or 1 (if 1, the memory cgroup is under OOM, tasks may
> be stopped.)
>
> +It is also possible to configure an oom killer timeout to prevent the
> +possibility that the memcg will deadlock looking for memory if userspace
> +has disabled the oom killer with oom_control but cannot act to fix the
> +condition itself (usually because userspace has become unresponsive).
> +
> +To set an oom killer timeout for a memcg, write the number of milliseconds
> +to wait before killing a task to memory.oom_delay_millisecs:
> +
> + # echo 60000 > memory.oom_delay_millisecs # 60 seconds before kill
> +
> +This timeout is reset the first time the memcg is oom to prevent needlessly
> +waiting for the next oom when userspace is truly unresponsive. It may be
> +set again using the above interface to defer killing a task the next time
> +the memcg is oom.
> +
> +Disabling the oom killer for a memcg with memory.oom_control takes
> +precedence over memory.oom_delay_millisecs, so it must be set to 0
> +(default) to allow the oom kill after the delay has expired.
> +
> +This value is inherited from the memcg's parent on creation.
> +
> +There is no delay if memory.oom_delay_millisecs is set to 0 (default).
> +This tunable's upper bound is 60 minutes.
Why upper-bounds is 60 minutes ? Do we have to have a limit ?
Hmm, I feel 60minutes is too short. I like 32 or 31 bit limit.
> +
> +
> 11. TODO
>
> 1. Add support for accounting huge pages (as a separate controller)
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index e6aadd6..951a22c 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> unsigned int swappiness;
> /* OOM-Killer disable */
> int oom_kill_disable;
> + /* number of ticks to stall before calling oom killer */
> + int oom_delay;
>
> /* set when res.limit == memsw.limit */
> bool memsw_is_minimum;
> @@ -1415,10 +1417,11 @@ static void memcg_oom_recover(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> /*
> * try to call OOM killer. returns false if we should exit memory-reclaim loop.
> */
> -bool mem_cgroup_handle_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t mask)
> +static bool mem_cgroup_handle_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t mask)
> {
> struct oom_wait_info owait;
> bool locked, need_to_kill;
> + long timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
>
> owait.mem = mem;
> owait.wait.flags = 0;
> @@ -1437,15 +1440,21 @@ bool mem_cgroup_handle_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t mask)
> prepare_to_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait, TASK_KILLABLE);
> if (!locked || mem->oom_kill_disable)
> need_to_kill = false;
> - if (locked)
> + if (locked) {
> + if (mem->oom_delay) {
> + need_to_kill = false;
> + timeout = mem->oom_delay;
> + mem->oom_delay = 0;
> + }
> mem_cgroup_oom_notify(mem);
> + }
> mutex_unlock(&memcg_oom_mutex);
>
> if (need_to_kill) {
> finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait);
> mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem, mask);
> } else {
> - schedule();
> + schedule_timeout(timeout);
> finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait);
> }
> mutex_lock(&memcg_oom_mutex);
> @@ -1456,7 +1465,8 @@ bool mem_cgroup_handle_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t mask)
> if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) || fatal_signal_pending(current))
> return false;
> /* Give chance to dying process */
> - schedule_timeout(1);
> + if (timeout != MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT)
!= ?
This seems to change existing behavior.
> + schedule_timeout(1);
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -3863,6 +3873,28 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_control_write(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static u64 mem_cgroup_oom_delay_millisecs_read(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> + struct cftype *cft)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
> +
> + return jiffies_to_msecs(memcg->oom_delay);
> +}
> +
> +static int mem_cgroup_oom_delay_millisecs_write(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> + struct cftype *cft, u64 val)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
> +
> + /* Sanity check -- don't wait longer than an hour */
> + if (val > (60 * 60 * 1000))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + memcg->oom_delay = msecs_to_jiffies(val);
> + memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
Please allow this to the root of sub-hierarchy and no children....(*)
(please check how mem_cgroup_oom_lock/unlock() works under use_hierarchy=1)
> static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = {
> {
> .name = "usage_in_bytes",
> @@ -3926,6 +3958,11 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = {
> .unregister_event = mem_cgroup_oom_unregister_event,
> .private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_OOM_TYPE, OOM_CONTROL),
> },
> + {
> + .name = "oom_delay_millisecs",
> + .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_oom_delay_millisecs_read,
> + .write_u64 = mem_cgroup_oom_delay_millisecs_write,
> + },
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
> @@ -4164,6 +4201,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont)
> parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont->parent);
> mem->use_hierarchy = parent->use_hierarchy;
> mem->oom_kill_disable = parent->oom_kill_disable;
> + mem->oom_delay = parent->oom_delay;
Becasue of (*), oom_kill_disable can be copied here.
If you want to inherit this, you should do (*) or update all hierarchy value.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-04 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-22 7:27 [patch] " David Rientjes
2010-12-22 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-22 8:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-22 8:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-22 8:48 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-22 8:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-22 8:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-22 9:21 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-27 1:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-22 9:04 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-22 8:42 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-22 22:45 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2010-12-27 0:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-28 5:22 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-28 6:29 ` [patch v3] " David Rientjes
2011-01-04 1:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-01-04 3:59 ` Balbir Singh
2011-01-06 1:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-06 5:46 ` Balbir Singh
2011-01-06 5:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-25 10:47 ` [patch] " Balbir Singh
2010-12-26 20:35 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110104104130.a3faf0d5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox