From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mlock: only hold mmap_sem in shared mode when faulting in pages
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:05:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101213170526.3b010058.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101214005140.GA29904@google.com>
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:51:40 -0800
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 8, 2010, Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, patch 1/6 changes the long hold time to be in read mode instead
> >> of write mode, which is only a band-aid. But, this prepares for patch
> >> 5/6, which releases mmap_sem whenever there is contention on it or
> >> when blocking on disk reads.
> >
> > I have to say that I'm not a huge fan of that horribly kludgy
> > contention check case.
> >
> > The "move page-in to read-locked sequence" and the changes to
> > get_user_pages look fine, but the contention thing is just disgusting.
> > I'd really like to see some other approach if at all possible.
>
> Andrew, should I amend my patches to remove the rwsem_is_contended() code ?
> This would involve:
> - remove rwsem-implement-rwsem_is_contended.patch and
> x86-rwsem-more-precise-rwsem_is_contended-implementation.patch
> - in mlock-do-not-hold-mmap_sem-for-extended-periods-of-time.patch,
> drop the one hunk making use of rwsem_is_contended (rest of the patch
> would still work without it)
I think I fixed all that up.
> - optionally, follow up patch to limit batch size to a constant
> in do_mlock_pages():
>
> diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
> index 569ae6a..a505a7e 100644
> --- a/mm/mlock.c
> +++ b/mm/mlock.c
> @@ -457,15 +457,23 @@ static int do_mlock_pages(unsigned long start, size_t len)
> continue;
> if (nstart < vma->vm_start)
> nstart = vma->vm_start;
> + /*
> + * Constrain batch size to limit mmap_sem hold time.
> + */
> + if (nend > nstart + 1024 * PAGE_SIZE)
> + nend = nstart + 1024 * PAGE_SIZE;
> /*
> * Now fault in a range of pages. __mlock_vma_pages_range()
> * double checks the vma flags, so that it won't mlock pages
> * if the vma was already munlocked.
> */
> ret = __mlock_vma_pages_range(vma, nstart, nend, &locked);
> if (ret < 0) {
> ret = __mlock_posix_error_return(ret);
> break;
> + } else if (locked) {
> + locked = 0;
> + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> }
> nend = nstart + ret * PAGE_SIZE;
> ret = 0;
>
>
> I don't really prefer using a constant, but I'm not sure how else to make
> Linus happy :)
rwsem_is_contended() didn't seem so bad to me.
Reading 1024 pages can still take a long time. I can't immediately
think of a better approach though.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-14 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-03 0:16 [PATCH 0/6] mlock: do not hold mmap_sem for extended periods of time Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] mlock: only hold mmap_sem in shared mode when faulting in pages Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-08 23:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-08 23:58 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-10 6:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-10 6:39 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-10 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-14 0:51 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-14 1:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-12-14 1:26 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-14 15:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-14 23:22 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: add FOLL_MLOCK follow_page flag Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-04 6:55 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm: move VM_LOCKED check to __mlock_vma_pages_range() Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] rwsem: implement rwsem_is_contended() Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] mlock: do not hold mmap_sem for extended periods of time Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-08 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86 rwsem: more precise rwsem_is_contended() implementation Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 22:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-03 22:51 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 23:02 ` [PATCH 0/6] mlock: do not hold mmap_sem for extended periods of time Michel Lespinasse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101213170526.3b010058.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox