From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A7866B0087 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:49:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from sim by peace.netnation.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPmgD-0004zQ-Hx for linux-mm@kvack.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:49:21 -0800 Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:49:21 -0800 From: Simon Kirby Subject: Behaviour during slab leak Message-ID: <20101207014921.GB13759@hostway.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: linux-mm List-ID: There was an NFS regression in 2.6.37-rc(1-4) that caused kmalloc-32 and kmalloc-16 to leak all over the place, and I noticed that while this was happening, the memory graphs looked odd in munin. Is this expected? This seems to relate to the size of Normal zone, which are the same as on the other 4 GB box I reported. http://0x.ca/sim/ref/2.6.37/nfsleak/memory_nfsleak.png http://0x.ca/sim/ref/2.6.37/nfsleak/ Maybe this is related to the too much free memory problems I am seeing? Simon- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org