Re: [RFC][PATCH] Cross Memory Attach v2 (resend)

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:06:24 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> 
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:28:47 +1030
> > Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@au1.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Resending just in case the previous mail was missed rather than ignored :-)
> > > I'd appreciate any comments....
> > 
> > Fear, uncertainty, doubt and resistance!
> > 
> > We have a bit of a track record of adding cool-looking syscalls and
> > then regretting it a few years later.  Few people use them, and maybe
> > they weren't so cool after all, and we have to maintain them for ever. 
> 
> They are often cut off at the libc level and never get into apps.
> 
> If we had tools/libc/ (mapped by the kernel automagically via the vDSO), where 
> people could add new syscall usage to actual, existing, real-life libc functions, 
> where the improvements could thus propagate into thousands of apps immediately, 
> without requiring any rebuild of apps or even any touching of the user-space 
> installation, we'd probably have _much_ more lively development in this area.
> 
> Right now it's slow and painful, and few new syscalls can break through the brick 
> wall of implementation latency, app adoption disinterest due to backwards 
> compatibility limitations and the resulting inevitable lack of testing and lack of 
> tangible utility.

Can't people use libc's syscall(2)?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>