From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3C26B004A for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 03:31:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:30:50 +0000 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 01 of 66] disable lumpy when compaction is enabled Message-ID: <20101118083049.GC8135@csn.ul.ie> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Adam Litke , Avi Kivity , Hugh Dickins , Rik van Riel , Dave Hansen , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , Mike Travis , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Christoph Lameter , Chris Wright , bpicco@redhat.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Balbir Singh , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Peter Zijlstra , Johannes Weiner , Daisuke Nishimura , Chris Mason , Borislav Petkov List-ID: On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 04:27:36PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > From: Andrea Arcangeli > > Compaction is more reliable than lumpy, and lumpy makes the system unusable > when it runs. > It took me a while but is "[PATCH 0/8] Use memory compaction instead of lumpy reclaim during high-order allocations" a suitable replacement for this patch? -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org