From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C558E5F0048 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:24:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.75]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o9K4OSxV000930 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:24:28 +0900 Received: from smail (m5 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D96B45DE54 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:24:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.95]) by m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDACA45DE4F for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:24:27 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5721DB805A for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:24:27 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.103]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D911DB8043 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:24:27 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:18:57 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] memcg: check memcg dirty limits in page writeback Message-Id: <20101020131857.cd0ecd38.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20101019100015.7a0d4695.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1287448784-25684-1-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com> <1287448784-25684-12-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com> <20101019100015.7a0d4695.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Greg Thelen , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, Andrea Righi , Balbir Singh , Daisuke Nishimura , Minchan Kim , Ciju Rajan K , David Rientjes List-ID: On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:00:15 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:39:44 -0700 > Greg Thelen wrote: > > > If the current process is in a non-root memcg, then > > global_dirty_limits() will consider the memcg dirty limit. > > This allows different cgroups to have distinct dirty limits > > which trigger direct and background writeback at different > > levels. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi > > Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen > > Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > Why FREEPAGES in memcg is not counted as dirtyable ? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org