linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [RFC]pagealloc: compensate a task for direct page reclaim
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:52:39 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100917145224.3BDB.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284636396.1726.5.camel@shli-laptop>

> A task enters into direct page reclaim, free some memory. But sometimes
> the task can't get a free page after direct page reclaim because
> other tasks take them (this is quite common in a multi-task workload
> in my test). This behavior will bring extra latency to the task and is
> unfair. Since the task already gets penalty, we'd better give it a compensation.
> If a task frees some pages from direct page reclaim, we cache one freed page,
> and the task will get it soon. We only consider order 0 allocation, because
> it's hard to cache order > 0 page.
> 
> Below is a trace output when a task frees some pages in try_to_free_pages(), but
> get_page_from_freelist() can't get a page in direct page reclaim.
> 
> <...>-809   [004]   730.218991: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 809, comm mmap_test
> <...>-806   [001]   730.237969: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 806, comm mmap_test
> <...>-810   [005]   730.237971: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 810, comm mmap_test
> <...>-809   [004]   730.237972: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 809, comm mmap_test
> <...>-811   [006]   730.241409: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 811, comm mmap_test
> <...>-809   [004]   730.241412: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 809, comm mmap_test
> <...>-812   [007]   730.241435: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 812, comm mmap_test
> <...>-809   [004]   730.245036: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 809, comm mmap_test
> <...>-809   [004]   730.260360: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 809, comm mmap_test
> <...>-805   [000]   730.260362: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 805, comm mmap_test
> <...>-811   [006]   730.263877: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 811, comm mmap_test

As far as I remembered, two years ago, similar patches was posted. but 
minchan found it makes performance regression when kernbench run.

http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20080905.101958.0f84e87d.ja.html



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-17  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-16 11:26 Shaohua Li
2010-09-16 15:00 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-17  2:34   ` Shaohua Li
2010-09-17  4:47     ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-20  8:50   ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-17  5:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100917145224.3BDB.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox