From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 744856B007B for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 03:22:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o8G7MbVa007459 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:22:37 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F8945DE55 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:22:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1184845DE51 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:22:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A791DB803E for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:22:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from m108.s.css.fujitsu.com (m108.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.108]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE8F1DB803B for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:22:35 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:17:27 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH][-mm] memcg : memory cgroup cpu hotplug support update. Message-Id: <20100916161727.04a1f905.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20100916152204.6c457936.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20100916144618.852b7e9a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100916062159.GF22371@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20100916152204.6c457936.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" List-ID: On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:22:04 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > This naming is from mem_cgroup_walk_tree(). Now we have > > mem_cgroup_walk_tree(); > mem_cgroup_walk_all(); > > Rename both ? But it should be in separated patch. > Considering a bit ...but.. #define for_each_mem_cgroup(mem) \ for (mem = mem_cgroup_get_first(); \ mem; \ mem = mem_cgroup_get_next(mem);) \ seems to need some helper functions. I'll consider about this clean up but it requires some amount of patch because css_get()/css_put()/rcu...etc.. are problematic. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org