From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4AA56B007B for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 02:57:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o8G6vLNZ016074 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:57:21 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872DE45DE58 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:57:20 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5769B45DE51 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:57:20 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B38E08004 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:57:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from m105.s.css.fujitsu.com (m105.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.105]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE88EE18009 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:57:17 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness() In-Reply-To: References: <20100916145452.3BB1.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20100916155413.3BC0.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:57:16 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: David Rientjes Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oss-security@lists.openwall.com, Solar Designer , Kees Cook , Al Viro , Oleg Nesterov , Neil Horman , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, pageexec@freemail.hu, Brad Spengler , Eugene Teo , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm List-ID: > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > Current oom_score_adj is completely broken because It is strongly bound > > google usecase and ignore other all. > > > > We've talked about this issue three times already. The last two times > you've sent a revert patch, you failed to followup on the threads: > > http://marc.info/?t=128272938200002 > http://marc.info/?t=128324705200002 > > And now you've gone above Andrew, who is the maintainer of this code, and > straight to Linus. Between that and your failure to respond to my answers > to your questions, I'm really stunned at how unprofessional you've handled > this. Selfish must die. you failed to persuade to me. and I havgen't get anyone's objection. Then, I don't care your ugly whining. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org