linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@gmail.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@au1.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Cross Memory Attach
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:08:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100916080826.GB21228@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100916105311.CA00.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>


* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 19:58, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Instead of those two syscalls, how about a vmfd(pid_t pid, ulong start,
> > > ulong len) system call which returns an file descriptor that represents a
> > > portion of the process address space.  You can then use preadv() and
> > > pwritev() to copy memory, and io_submit(IO_CMD_PREADV) and
> > > io_submit(IO_CMD_PWRITEV) for asynchronous variants (especially useful with
> > > a dma engine, since that adds latency).
> > >
> > > With some care (and use of mmu_notifiers) you can even mmap() your vmfd and
> > > access remote process memory directly.
> > 
> > Rather than introducing a new vmfd() API for this, why not just add
> > implementations for these more efficient operations to the existing
> > /proc/$pid/mem interface?
> 
> As far as I heared from my friend, old HP MPI implementation used 
> /proc/$pid/mem for this purpose. (I don't know current status). 
> However almost implementation doesn't do that because /proc/$pid/mem 
> required the process is ptraced. As far as I understand , very old 
> /proc/$pid/mem doesn't require it. but It changed for security 
> concern. Then, Anybody haven't want to change this interface because 
> they worry break security.
> 
> But, I don't know what exactly protected "the process is ptraced" 
> check. If anyone explain the reason and we can remove it. I'm not 
> againt at all.

I did some Git digging - that ptrace check for /proc/$pid/mem read/write 
goes all the way back to the beginning of written human history, aka 
Linux v2.6.12-rc2.

I researched the fragmented history of the stone ages as well, i checked 
out numerous cave paintings, and while much was lost, i was able to 
recover this old fragment of a clue in the cave called 'patch-2.3.27', 
carbon-dated back as far as the previous millenium (!):

  mem_read() in fs/proc/base.c:

+ *  1999, Al Viro. Rewritten. Now it covers the whole per-process part.
+ *  Instead of using magical inumbers to determine the kind of object
+ *  we allocate and fill in-core inodes upon lookup. They don't even
+ *  go into icache. We cache the reference to task_struct upon lookup too.
+ *  Eventually it should become a filesystem in its own. We don't use the
+ *  rest of procfs anymore.

In such a long timespan language has changed much, so not all of this 
scribbling can be interpreted - but one thing appears to be sure: this 
is where the MAY_PTRACE() restriction was introduced to /proc/$pid/mem - 
as part of a massive rewrite.

Alas, the reason for the restriction was not documented, and is feared 
to be lost forever.

Thanks,

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2010-09-16  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20100915104855.41de3ebf@lilo>
2010-09-15  8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-15  8:16   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-15 13:23     ` Christopher Yeoh
2010-09-15 13:20   ` Christopher Yeoh
2010-09-15 10:58 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-15 13:51   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-15 16:10     ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-15 14:42   ` Christopher Yeoh
2010-09-15 14:52     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-15 15:44       ` Robin Holt
2010-09-16  6:32     ` Brice Goglin
2010-09-16  9:15       ` Brice Goglin
2010-09-16 14:00         ` Christopher Yeoh
2010-09-15 14:46   ` Bryan Donlan
2010-09-15 16:13     ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-15 19:35       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-09-16  1:18     ` Christopher Yeoh
2010-09-16  9:26       ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-02  3:37         ` Christopher Yeoh
2010-11-02 11:10           ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-16  1:58     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-16  8:08       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100916080826.GB21228@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=bdonlan@gmail.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=cyeoh@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox