linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page()
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:14:44 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100914191250.C9C7.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100913091405.GB23508@csn.ul.ie>

> > example, 
> > 
> > __do_fault()
> > {
> > (snip)
> >         if (unlikely(!(ret & VM_FAULT_LOCKED)))
> >                 lock_page(vmf.page);
> >         else
> >                 VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(vmf.page));
> > 
> >         /*
> >          * Should we do an early C-O-W break?
> >          */
> >         page = vmf.page;
> >         if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
> >                 if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
> >                         anon = 1;
> >                         if (unlikely(anon_vma_prepare(vma))) {
> >                                 ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
> >                                 goto out;
> >                         }
> >                         page = alloc_page_vma(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE,
> >                                                 vma, address);
> > 
> 
> Correct, this is a problem. I already had dropped the patch but thanks for
> pointing out a deadlock because I was missing this case. Nothing stops the
> page being faulted being sent to shrink_page_list() when alloc_page_vma()
> is called. The deadlock might be hard to hit, but it's there.

Yup, unfortunatelly.



> > Afaik, detailed rule is,
> > 
> > o kswapd can call lock_page() because they never take page lock outside vmscan
> 
> lock_page_nosync as you point out in your next mail. While it can call
> it, kswapd shouldn't because normally it avoids stalls but it would not
> deadlock as a result of calling it.

Agreed.


> > o if try_lock() is successed, we can call lock_page_nosync() against its page after unlock.
> >   because the task have gurantee of no lock taken.
> > o otherwise, direct reclaimer can't call lock_page(). the task may have a lock already.
> > 
> 
> I think the safer bet is simply to say "direct reclaimers should not
> call lock_page() because the fault path could be holding a lock on that
> page already".

Yup, agreed.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-14 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-06 10:47 [PATCH 0/9] Reduce latencies and improve overall reclaim efficiency v1 Mel Gorman
2010-09-06 10:47 ` [PATCH 01/10] tracing, vmscan: Add trace events for LRU list shrinking Mel Gorman
2010-09-06 10:47 ` [PATCH 02/10] writeback: Account for time spent congestion_waited Mel Gorman
2010-09-06 10:47 ` [PATCH 03/10] writeback: Do not congestion sleep if there are no congested BDIs or significant writeback Mel Gorman
2010-09-07 15:25   ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-08 11:04     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-08 14:52       ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-09  8:54         ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-12 15:37           ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-13  8:55             ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-13  9:48               ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-13 10:07                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-13 10:20                   ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-13 10:30                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-08 21:23   ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-09 10:43     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-09  3:02   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-09  8:58     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-06 10:47 ` [PATCH 04/10] vmscan: Synchronous lumpy reclaim should not call congestion_wait() Mel Gorman
2010-09-07 15:26   ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-08  6:15   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-09-08 11:25   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-09  3:03   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-06 10:47 ` [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page() Mel Gorman
2010-09-07 15:28   ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-08  6:16   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-09-08 11:28   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-09  3:04   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-09  3:15     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-09  3:25       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-09  4:13       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-09  9:22         ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-10 10:25           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-10 10:33             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-13  9:14             ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-14 10:14               ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-09-06 10:47 ` [PATCH 06/10] vmscan: Narrow the scenarios lumpy reclaim uses synchrounous reclaim Mel Gorman
2010-09-09  3:14   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-06 10:47 ` [PATCH 07/10] vmscan: Remove dead code in shrink_inactive_list() Mel Gorman
2010-09-07 15:33   ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-06 10:47 ` [PATCH 08/10] vmscan: isolated_lru_pages() stop neighbour search if neighbour cannot be isolated Mel Gorman
2010-09-07 15:37   ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-08 11:12     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-08 14:58       ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-08 11:37   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-08 12:50     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-08 13:14       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-08 13:27         ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-09  3:17   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-06 10:47 ` [PATCH 09/10] vmscan: Do not writeback filesystem pages in direct reclaim Mel Gorman
2010-09-13 13:31   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 13:55     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-13 14:33       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-10-28 21:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-29 10:26     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-06 10:47 ` [PATCH 10/10] vmscan: Kick flusher threads to clean pages when reclaim is encountering dirty pages Mel Gorman
2010-09-09  3:22   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-09  9:32     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-13  0:53       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-13 13:48   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 14:10     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-13 14:41       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-06 10:49 ` [PATCH 0/9] Reduce latencies and improve overall reclaim efficiency v1 Mel Gorman
2010-09-08  3:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-08  8:38   ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-13 23:10 ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100914191250.C9C7.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox