From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 198AB6B0078 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 23:21:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.76]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o893Kvul014759 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:20:58 +0900 Received: from smail (m6 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D855D45DD71 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:20:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.96]) by m6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60E245DE4E for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:20:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD241DB8017 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:20:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from m107.s.css.fujitsu.com (m107.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.107]) by s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7701DB8012 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:20:56 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:15:47 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page() Message-Id: <20100909121547.2e69735a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20100909120448.58acc9a6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1283770053-18833-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1283770053-18833-6-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <20100909120448.58acc9a6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Mel Gorman , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel List , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Minchan Kim , Wu Fengguang , Andrea Arcangeli , KOSAKI Motohiro , Dave Chinner , Chris Mason , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:04:48 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:47:28 +0100 > Mel Gorman wrote: > > > From: KOSAKI Motohiro > > > > With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim > > pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of > > trylock_page() in this case. > > > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman > > Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > Ah......but can't this change cause dead lock ?? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org