From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76B5C6B0047 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:44:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o882i9cK029580 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:10 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7284945DE4D for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:09 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B1B45DE50 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:09 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E6F1DB8037 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:09 +0900 (JST) Received: from m108.s.css.fujitsu.com (m108.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.108]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50C41DB803B for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:08 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [BUGFIX for 2.6.36][RESEND][PATCH 1/2] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness() In-Reply-To: <20100831181911.87E7.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20100831181911.87E7.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20100907120046.C90A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:07 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, LKML , linux-mm , Linus Torvalds , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , David Rientjes List-ID: > ok, this one got no objection except original patch author. > then, I'll push it to mainline. I'm glad that I who stabilization > developer have finished this work. > > If you think this patch is slightly large, please run, > % git diff a63d83f42^ mm/oom_kill.c > you'll understand this is minimal revert of unnecessary change. Andrew, please don't be lazy this one. I don't hope to slip this anymore. I was making the patch as you requested. but no responce. I who stabilization developr can't permit this userland breakage and sucky status. please join to fix it. Sadly, The delay will be increase, I have to switch full revert entirely instead your opinion. Spell out: I don't hope to continus this crazy discussion. a userland breakage bug is a bug, not anything else. I don't hope to talk this one anymore even though it's only 5 miniture. I don't think any rare usecase feature should die. but ZERO USER FEATURE SHOULDN'T BREAK USERLAND. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org