From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A2986B007D for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:44:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.72]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o882iBSV002192 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:12 +0900 Received: from smail (m2 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD65045DE55 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.92]) by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC2C45DE51 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E5F1DB803B for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from m108.s.css.fujitsu.com (m108.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.108]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339301DB8038 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:08 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [BUGFIX for 2.6.36][RESEND][PATCH 1/2] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness() In-Reply-To: References: <20100831181911.87E7.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20100907114223.C907.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:07 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: David Rientjes Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-ID: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > ok, this one got no objection except original patch author. > > Would you care to respond to my objections? > > I replied to these two patches earlier with my nack, here they are: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128273555323993 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128337879310476 > > Please carry on a useful debate of the issues rather than continually > resending patches and labeling them as bugfixes, which they aren't. You are still talking about only your usecase. Why do we care you? Why? Why don't you fix the code by yourself? Why? Why do you continue selfish development? Why? I can't understand. > > then, I'll push it to mainline. I'm glad that I who stabilization > > developer have finished this work. > > > > You're not the maintainer of this code, patches go through Andrew. > > That said, I'm really tired of you trying to make this personal with me; > I've been very respectful and accomodating during this discussion and I > hope that you will be the same. As I said, You only need to don't break userland and fix the code immediately. You don't have to expect stabilization developer allow userland and code breakage. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org