From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX for 2.6.36][RESEND][PATCH 1/2] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness()
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:07 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100907114223.C907.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009011508440.29305@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > ok, this one got no objection except original patch author.
>
> Would you care to respond to my objections?
>
> I replied to these two patches earlier with my nack, here they are:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128273555323993
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128337879310476
>
> Please carry on a useful debate of the issues rather than continually
> resending patches and labeling them as bugfixes, which they aren't.
You are still talking about only your usecase. Why do we care you? Why?
Why don't you fix the code by yourself? Why? Why do you continue selfish
development? Why? I can't understand.
> > then, I'll push it to mainline. I'm glad that I who stabilization
> > developer have finished this work.
> >
>
> You're not the maintainer of this code, patches go through Andrew.
>
> That said, I'm really tired of you trying to make this personal with me;
> I've been very respectful and accomodating during this discussion and I
> hope that you will be the same.
As I said, You only need to don't break userland and fix the code immediately.
You don't have to expect stabilization developer allow userland and code
breakage.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-08 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-31 9:29 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-31 9:30 ` [BUGFIX for 2.6.36][RESEND][PATCH 2/2] Revert "oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable" KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-01 22:18 ` [BUGFIX for 2.6.36][RESEND][PATCH 1/2] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness() David Rientjes
2010-09-08 2:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-09-08 3:21 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-08 8:24 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-08 2:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100907114223.C907.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox