From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:24:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100903182405.9f4ca539.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100903091509.GE10686@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:15:09 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> Just in case that my old (buggy) approach still matters, here is the
> updated (and hopefully fixed) patch.
>
as my patch shows, you can drop more codes from set_pagetype_migrate().
is_removable() and that should use the same logic.
...
And there are some bugs should be fixed as I shown.
If you get ack from someone, please go ahead. I'll make add-on.
Thanks,
-Kame
> ---
>
> From 5e0436a854d7103eba53f173f6839032a2f43c21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:39:16 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code
>
> Currently is_mem_section_removable checks whether each pageblock from
> the given pfn range is of MIGRATE_MOVABLE type or if it is free. If both
> are false then the range is considered non removable.
>
> On the other hand, offlining code (more specifically
> set_migratetype_isolate) doesn't care whether a page is free and instead
> it just checks the migrate type of the page and whether the page's zone
> is movable.
>
> This can lead into a situation when we can mark a node as not removable
> just because a pageblock is MIGRATE_RESERVE and it is not free but still
> movable.
>
> Let's make a common helper is_page_removable which unifies both tests
> at one place.
>
> Do not rely on any of MIGRATE_* types as all others but MIGRATE_MOVABLE
> may be tricky. MIGRATE_RESERVE can be anything that just happened to
> fallback to that allocation. MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE can be unmovable
> because slab (or what ever) has this page currently in use and cannot
> release it. If we tried to remove those pages and the isolation failed
> then those blocks would get into the MIRAGTE_MOVABLE list
> unconditionally and we will end up having unmovable pages in the movable
> list.
>
> Let's, instead, check just whether a pageblock contains only free or LRU
> pages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> ---
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 4 +++
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +---
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> index 864035f..5c448f7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> @@ -194,12 +194,16 @@ static inline void register_page_bootmem_info_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
>
> extern int is_mem_section_removable(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages);
>
> +bool is_page_removable(struct page *page);
> +
> #else
> static inline int is_mem_section_removable(unsigned long pfn,
> unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +#define is_page_removable(page) 0
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
>
> extern int mem_online_node(int nid);
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index a4cfcdc..ccd927d 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,39 @@ static inline int pageblock_free(struct page *page)
> return PageBuddy(page) && page_order(page) >= pageblock_order;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * A free or LRU pages block are removable
> + * Do not use MIGRATE_MOVABLE because it can be insufficient and
> + * other MIGRATE types are tricky.
> + * Do not hold zone->lock as this is used from user space by the
> + * sysfs interface.
> + */
> +bool is_page_removable(struct page *page)
> +{
> + int page_block = 1 << pageblock_order;
> + while (page_block > 0) {
> + int order = 0;
> +
> + if (pfn_valid_within(page_to_pfn(page))) {
> + if (PageBuddy(page)) {
> + order = page_order(page);
> + } else if (!PageLRU(page))
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + /* We are not holding zone lock so the page
> + * might get used since we tested it for buddy
> + * flag. This is just a informative check so
> + * live with that and rely that we catch this
> + * in the page_block test.
> + */
> + page_block -= 1 << order;
> + page += 1 << order;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /* Return the start of the next active pageblock after a given page */
> static struct page *next_active_pageblock(struct page *page)
> {
> @@ -608,13 +641,7 @@ int is_mem_section_removable(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
>
> /* Check the starting page of each pageblock within the range */
> for (; page < end_page; page = next_active_pageblock(page)) {
> - type = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
> -
> - /*
> - * A pageblock containing MOVABLE or free pages is considered
> - * removable
> - */
> - if (type != MIGRATE_MOVABLE && !pageblock_free(page))
> + if (!is_page_removable(page))
> return 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -770,6 +797,7 @@ check_pages_isolated_cb(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +
> static long
> check_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> {
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index a9649f4..c2e2576 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5277,14 +5277,11 @@ int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page)
> struct memory_isolate_notify arg;
> int notifier_ret;
> int ret = -EBUSY;
> - int zone_idx;
>
> zone = page_zone(page);
> - zone_idx = zone_idx(zone);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
> - if (get_pageblock_migratetype(page) == MIGRATE_MOVABLE ||
> - zone_idx == ZONE_MOVABLE) {
> + if (is_page_removable(page)) {
> ret = 0;
> goto out;
> }
> --
> 1.7.1
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> L3 team
> SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
> Lihovarska 1060/12
> 190 00 Praha 9
> Czech Republic
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-03 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-20 14:14 [PATCH] " Michal Hocko
2010-08-22 0:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-23 9:22 ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-31 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-31 14:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-01 1:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-01 12:19 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-01 12:41 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 5:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 9:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02 9:24 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 11:19 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 14:19 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 14:39 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 15:05 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 3:10 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/2][BUGFIX] fix next active pageblock calculation KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 9:50 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 10:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 11:01 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 11:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code v3 Michal Hocko
2010-09-04 2:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-06 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2010-09-03 7:54 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] " Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 7:57 ` [PATCH 3/2][BUGFIX] fix memory isolation notifier return value check KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 22:05 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100903182405.9f4ca539.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=haicheng.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox