From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail191.messagelabs.com (mail191.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC966B0095 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 05:15:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:15:09 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code Message-ID: <20100903091509.GE10686@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References: <20100902180343.f4232c6e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100902092454.GA17971@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20100902131855.GC10265@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20100902143939.GD10265@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20100902150554.GE10265@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20100903121003.e2b8993a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100903121452.2d22b3aa.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100903082558.GC10686@tiehlicka.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100903082558.GC10686@tiehlicka.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Hiroyuki Kamezawa , Wu Fengguang , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , "Kleen, Andi" , Haicheng Li , Christoph Lameter , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mel Gorman List-ID: Just in case that my old (buggy) approach still matters, here is the updated (and hopefully fixed) patch. ---