From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][BUGFIX] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness()
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:39:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100826093923.d4ac29b6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008250300500.13300@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
>
> > 3) No reason to implement ABI breakage.
> > old tuning parameter mean)
> > oom-score = oom-base-score x 2^oom_adj
>
> Everybody knows this is useless beyond polarizing a task for kill or
> making it immune.
>
> > new tuning parameter mean)
> > oom-score = oom-base-score + oom_score_adj / (totalram + totalswap)
>
> This, on the other hand, has an actual unit (proportion of available
> memory) that can be used to prioritize tasks amongst those competing for
> the same set of shared resources and remains constant even when a task
> changes cpuset, its memcg limit changes, etc.
>
> And your equation is wrong, it's
>
> ((rss + swap) / (available ram + swap)) + oom_score_adj
>
> which is completely different from what you think it is.
>
I'm now trying to write a userspace tool to calculate this, for me.
Then, could you update documentation ?
==
3.2 /proc/<pid>/oom_score - Display current oom-killer score
-------------------------------------------------------------
This file can be used to check the current score used by the oom-killer is for
any given <pid>. Use it together with /proc/<pid>/oom_adj to tune which
process should be killed in an out-of-memory situation.
==
add a some documentation like:
==
(For system monitoring tool developpers, not for usual users.)
oom_score calculation is implemnentation dependent and can be modified without
any caution. But current logic is
oom_score = ((proc's rss + proc's swap) / (available ram + swap)) + oom_score_adj
proc's rss and swap can be obtained by /proc/<pid>/statm and available ram + swap
is dependent on the situation.
If the system is totaly under oom,
available ram == /proc/meminfo's MemTotal
available swap == in most case == /proc/meminfo's SwapTotal
When you use memory cgroup,
When swap is limited, avaliable ram + swap == memory cgroup's memsw limit.
When swap is unlimited, avaliable ram + swap = memory cgroup's memory limit +
SwapTotal
Then, please be careful that oom_score's order among tasks depends on the
situation. Assume 2 proceses A, B which has oom_score_adj of 300 and 0
And A uses 200M, B uses 1G of memory under 4G system
Under the 4G system.
A's socre = (200M *1000)/4G + 300 = 350
B's score = (1G * 1000)/4G = 250.
In the memory cgroup, it has 2G of resource.
A's score = (200M * 1000)/2G + 300 = 400
B's socre = (1G * 1000)/2G = 500
You shoudn't depend on /proc/<pid>/oom_score if you have to handle OOM under
cgroups and cpuset. But the logic is simple.
==
If you don't want, I'll add text and a sample tool to cgroup/memory.txt.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-26 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-25 9:42 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-25 9:42 ` [PATCH 2/2][BUGFIX] Revert "oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable" KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-25 10:27 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-25 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/2][BUGFIX] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness() David Rientjes
2010-08-26 0:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2010-08-26 0:52 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-26 1:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-26 1:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-26 2:50 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-26 3:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-26 3:52 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-30 2:58 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-01 22:06 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-08 2:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-08 3:12 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100826093923.d4ac29b6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox