linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	gthelen@google.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"menage@google.com" <menage@google.com>,
	"lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] memcg: lockless update of file stat with move-account safe method
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:10:50 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100825171050.1574ba7c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100825170435.15f8eb73.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

At accounting file events per memory cgroup, we need to find memory cgroup
via page_cgroup->mem_cgroup. Now, we use lock_page_cgroup().

But, considering the context which page-cgroup for files are accessed,
we can use alternative light-weight mutual execusion in the most case.
At handling file-caches, the only race we have to take care of is "moving"
account, IOW, overwriting page_cgroup->mem_cgroup. Because file status
update is done while the page-cache is in stable state, we don't have to
take care of race with charge/uncharge.

Unlike charge/uncharge, "move" happens not so frequently. It happens only when
rmdir() and task-moving (with a special settings.)
This patch adds a race-checker for file-cache-status accounting v.s. account
moving. The new per-cpu-per-memcg counter MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE is added.
The routine for account move 
  1. Increment it before start moving
  2. Call synchronize_rcu()
  3. Decrement it after the end of moving.
By this, file-status-counting routine can check it needs to call
lock_page_cgroup(). In most case, I doesn't need to call it.

Changelog: 20100825
 - added a comment about mc.lock
 - fixed bad lock.
Changelog: 20100804
 - added a comment for possible optimization hint.
Changelog: 20100730
 - some cleanup.
Changelog: 20100729
 - replaced __this_cpu_xxx() with this_cpu_xxx
   (because we don't call spinlock)
 - added VM_BUG_ON().

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Index: mmotm-0811/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-0811.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-0811/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ enum mem_cgroup_stat_index {
 	MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGOUT_COUNT,	/* # of pages paged out */
 	MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAPOUT, /* # of pages, swapped out */
 	MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS,	/* incremented at every  pagein/pageout */
+	MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE,   /* A check for locking move account/status */
 
 	MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS,
 };
@@ -1089,7 +1090,52 @@ static unsigned int get_swappiness(struc
 	return swappiness;
 }
 
-/* A routine for testing mem is not under move_account */
+static void mem_cgroup_start_move(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+	int cpu;
+	/*
+	 * reuse mc.lock.
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&mc.lock);
+	/* TODO: Can we optimize this by for_each_online_cpu() ? */
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		per_cpu(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE], cpu) += 1;
+	spin_unlock(&mc.lock);
+
+	synchronize_rcu();
+}
+
+static void mem_cgroup_end_move(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	if (!mem)
+		return;
+	/* for fast checking in mem_cgroup_update_file_stat() etc..*/
+	spin_lock(&mc.lock);
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		per_cpu(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE], cpu) -= 1;
+	spin_unlock(&mc.lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * mem_cgroup_is_moved -- checking a cgroup is mc.from target or not.
+ *                          used for avoiding race.
+ * mem_cgroup_under_move -- checking a cgroup is mc.from or mc.to or
+ *			    under hierarchy of them. used for waiting at
+ *			    memory pressure.
+ * Result of is_moved can be trusted until the end of rcu_read_unlock().
+ * The caller must do
+ *	rcu_read_lock();
+ *	result = mem_cgroup_is_moved();
+ *	.....make use of result here....
+ *	rcu_read_unlock();
+ */
+static bool mem_cgroup_is_moved(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+	VM_BUG_ON(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+	return this_cpu_read(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE]) > 0;
+}
 
 static bool mem_cgroup_under_move(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
 {
@@ -1505,29 +1551,36 @@ void mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped(struc
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
 	struct page_cgroup *pc;
+	bool need_lock = false;
 
 	pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
 	if (unlikely(!pc))
 		return;
-
-	lock_page_cgroup(pc);
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	mem = id_to_memcg(pc->mem_cgroup, true);
-	if (!mem || !PageCgroupUsed(pc))
+	if (likely(mem)) {
+		if (mem_cgroup_is_moved(mem)) {
+			/* need to serialize with move_account */
+			lock_page_cgroup(pc);
+			need_lock = true;
+			mem = id_to_memcg(pc->mem_cgroup, true);
+			if (unlikely(!mem))
+				goto done;
+		}
+	}
+	if (unlikely(!PageCgroupUsed(pc)))
 		goto done;
-
-	/*
-	 * Preemption is already disabled. We can use __this_cpu_xxx
-	 */
 	if (val > 0) {
-		__this_cpu_inc(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
+		this_cpu_inc(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
 		SetPageCgroupFileMapped(pc);
 	} else {
-		__this_cpu_dec(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
+		this_cpu_dec(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
 		ClearPageCgroupFileMapped(pc);
 	}
-
 done:
-	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
+	if (need_lock)
+		unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3067,6 +3120,7 @@ move_account:
 		lru_add_drain_all();
 		drain_all_stock_sync();
 		ret = 0;
+		mem_cgroup_start_move(mem);
 		for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
 			for (zid = 0; !ret && zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
 				enum lru_list l;
@@ -3080,6 +3134,7 @@ move_account:
 			if (ret)
 				break;
 		}
+		mem_cgroup_end_move(mem);
 		memcg_oom_recover(mem);
 		/* it seems parent cgroup doesn't have enough mem */
 		if (ret == -ENOMEM)
@@ -4564,6 +4619,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_clear_mc(void)
 	mc.to = NULL;
 	mc.moving_task = NULL;
 	spin_unlock(&mc.lock);
+	mem_cgroup_end_move(from);
 	memcg_oom_recover(from);
 	memcg_oom_recover(to);
 	wake_up_all(&mc.waitq);
@@ -4594,6 +4650,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_can_attach(struct 
 			VM_BUG_ON(mc.moved_charge);
 			VM_BUG_ON(mc.moved_swap);
 			VM_BUG_ON(mc.moving_task);
+			mem_cgroup_start_move(from);
 			spin_lock(&mc.lock);
 			mc.from = from;
 			mc.to = mem;

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-25  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-25  8:04 [PATCH 0/5] memcg: towards I/O aware memcg v6 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-25  8:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] cgroup: do ID allocation under css allocator KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-25 14:15   ` Balbir Singh
2010-08-26  0:13     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-31  6:33       ` Balbir Singh
2010-08-30  5:44   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-08-25  8:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] memcg: quick memcg lookup array KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-30  8:03   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-09-01  0:29     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-31  7:14   ` Balbir Singh
2010-09-01  0:21     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] memcg: use ID instead of pointer in page_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-31  2:14   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-08-25  8:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2010-08-31  3:51   ` [PATCH 4/5] memcg: lockless update of file stat with move-account safe method Daisuke Nishimura
2010-09-01  0:31     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-25  8:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] memcg: generic file stat accounting interface KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-31  4:33   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-09-01  0:31     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100825171050.1574ba7c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox