From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Hugepage migration (v2)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:18:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100817081817.GA28969@spritzera.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100817023719.GC12736@spritzera.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:37:19AM +0900, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 07:19:58AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> >
> > > In my understanding, in current code "other processors increasing refcount
> > > during migration" can happen both in non-hugepage direct I/O and in hugepage
> > > direct I/O in the similar way (i.e. get_user_pages_fast() from dio_refill_pages()).
> > > So I think there is no specific problem to hugepage.
> > > Or am I missing your point?
> >
> > With a single page there is the check of the refcount during migration
> > after all the references have been removed (at that point the page is no
> > longer mapped by any process and direct iO can no longer be
> > initiated without a page fault.
>
> The same checking mechanism works for hugeapge.
So, my previous comment below was not correct:
>>> This patch only handles migration under direct I/O.
>>> For the opposite (direct I/O under migration) it's not true.
>>> I wrote additional patches (later I'll reply to this email)
>>> for solving locking problem. Could you review them?
The hugepage migration patchset should work fine without the
additional page locking patch.
Please ignore the additional page locking patch-set
and review the hugepage migration patch-set only.
Sorry for confusion.
I explain below why the page lock in direct I/O is not needed to avoid
race with migration. This is true for both hugepage and non-huge page.
Race between page migration and direct I/O is in essense the one between
try_to_unmap() in unmap_and_move() and get_user_pages_fast() in dio_get_page().
When try_to_unmap() is called before get_user_pages_fast(),
all ptes pointing to the page to be migrated are replaced to migration
swap entries, so direct I/O code experiences page fault.
In the page fault, the kernel finds migration swap entry and waits the page lock
(which was held by migration code before try_to_unmap()) to be unlocked
in migration_entry_wait(), so direct I/O blocks until migration completes.
When get_user_pages_fast() is called before try_to_unmap(),
direct I/O code increments refcount on the target page.
Because this refcount is not associated to the mapping,
migration code will find remaining refcounts after try_to_unmap()
unmaps all mappings. Then refcount check decides migration to fail,
so direct I/O is continued safely.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-17 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-10 9:27 Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-10 9:27 ` [PATCH 1/9] HWPOISON, hugetlb: move PG_HWPoison bit check Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-18 0:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-19 7:55 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-19 9:28 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-23 9:24 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-10 9:27 ` [PATCH 2/9] hugetlb: add allocate function for hugepage migration Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-17 6:51 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-18 3:02 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-10 9:27 ` [PATCH 3/9] hugetlb: rename hugepage allocation functions Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-10 9:27 ` [PATCH 4/9] hugetlb: redefine hugepage copy functions Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-10 9:27 ` [PATCH 5/9] hugetlb: hugepage migration core Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-10 9:27 ` [PATCH 6/9] HWPOISON, hugetlb: soft offlining for hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-10 9:27 ` [PATCH 7/9] HWPOISON, hugetlb: fix unpoison " Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-10 9:27 ` [PATCH 8/9] page-types.c: fix name of unpoison interface Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-19 1:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-10 9:27 ` [PATCH 9/9] hugetlb: add corrupted hugepage counter Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-19 1:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-24 3:01 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 3:08 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-11 13:09 ` [PATCH 0/9] Hugepage migration (v2) Christoph Lameter
2010-08-12 7:53 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-12 7:57 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/4] hugetlb: prepare exclusion control functions for hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-12 7:59 ` [RFC] [PATCH 2/4] dio: add page locking for direct I/O Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-12 13:42 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-16 2:07 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-16 7:21 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-16 13:20 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-17 8:17 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-17 13:46 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-17 14:21 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-17 16:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-12 8:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] HWPOISON: replace locking functions into hugepage variants Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-12 8:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] correct locking functions of hugepage migration routine Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-13 12:47 ` [PATCH 0/9] Hugepage migration (v2) Christoph Lameter
2010-08-16 9:19 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-16 12:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-17 2:37 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-17 8:18 ` Naoya Horiguchi [this message]
2010-08-17 9:40 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-18 7:32 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-18 7:46 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100817081817.GA28969@spritzera.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
--to=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox