From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60BBB6008E4 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 03:20:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.72]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o737Q2A3022673 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:26:02 +0900 Received: from smail (m2 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E23A45DE63 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:26:02 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.92]) by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6803245DE51 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:26:02 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EB21DB8041 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:26:02 +0900 (JST) Received: from m106.s.css.fujitsu.com (m106.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.106]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A89E08002 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:26:01 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:21:11 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [patch -mm 1/2] oom: badness heuristic rewrite Message-Id: <20100803162111.2f8dfded.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20100730091125.4AC3.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100730195338.4AF6.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100802134312.c0f48615.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100803090058.48c0a0c9.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100803093610.f4d30ca7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100803100815.11d10519.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100803102423.82415a17.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100803110534.e3e7a697.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100803121146.cf35b7ed.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100803133255.deb5c208.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: David Rientjes Cc: Andrew Morton , KOSAKI Motohiro , Nick Piggin , Oleg Nesterov , Balbir Singh , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 00:23:32 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote: > > Especially with memcg, it just shows a _broken_ value. > > > > Not at all, the user knows what tasks are attached to the memcg and can > easily determine which task is going to be killed when it ooms: simply > iterate through the memcg tasklist, check /proc/pid/oom_score, and sort. > And finds at system oom, process A is killed. at memcg oom, process B is killed. funny non-deteministic interace, aha. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org