From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem - v4
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:56:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100728155617.GA5401@barrios-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007281005440.21717@router.home>
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:14:51AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > static inline int memmap_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> > {
> > struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> > struct page *__pg = virt_to_page(page);
>
> Does that work both for vmemmap and real mmapping?
When Kame suggested this idea, he doesn't consider vmemmap model.
(He prevent this featur's enabling by config !SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
config SPARSEMEM_HAS_HOLE
bool "allow holes in sparsemem's memmap"
depends on ARM && SPARSEMEM && !SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
default n
When I change it with ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL, it was my mistake.
I can change it with ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL && !SPARSE_VMEMMAP.
I wonder whether we supports VMEMMAP.
That's because hole problem of sparsemem is specific on ARM.
ARM forks uses it for saving memory space but VMEMMAP does use more memory.
I think it's irony.
>
> > return page_private(__pg) == MAGIC_MEMMAP && PageReserved(__pg);
> > }
>
> Problem is that pages may be allocated for the mmap from a variety of
> places. The pages in mmap_init_zone() and allocated during boot may have
> PageReserved set whereas the page allocated via vmemmap_alloc_block() have
> PageReserved cleared since they came from the page allocator.
>
> You need to have consistent use of PageReserved in page structs for the
> mmap in order to do this properly.
Yes if we supports both model.
>
> Simplest scheme would be to clear PageReserved() in all page struct
> associated with valid pages and clear those for page structs that do not
> refer to valid pages.
I can't understand your words.
Clear PG_resereved in valid pages and invalid pages both?
I guess your code look like that clear PG_revered on valid memmap
but set PG_reserved on invalid memmap.
Right?
invalid memmap pages will be freed by free_memmap and will be used
on any place. How do we make sure it has PG_reserved?
Maybe I don't understand your point.
>
> Then
>
> mmap_valid = !PageReserved(xxx(pfn_to_page(pfn))
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-28 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 15:46 Minchan Kim
2010-07-26 16:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-26 22:47 ` Minchan Kim
[not found] ` <pfn.valid.v4.reply.1@mdm.bga.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTimtTVvorrR9pDVTyPKj0HbYOYY3aR7B-QWGhTei@mail.gmail.com>
2010-07-27 8:12 ` Milton Miller
2010-07-27 8:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-27 10:01 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-27 14:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-27 22:33 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-28 15:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-28 15:56 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-07-28 17:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-28 22:57 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-29 15:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-29 16:18 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-29 16:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-29 17:03 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-29 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-29 18:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-29 19:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-29 21:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-29 20:55 ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-29 22:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-29 22:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-30 0:38 ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-30 9:43 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-30 12:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-30 15:43 ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-31 15:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-02 15:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-30 9:32 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-31 10:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-11 15:31 ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-27 9:56 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100728155617.GA5401@barrios-desktop \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox