From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B02C6B024D for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:14:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o6N5E4Zq027464 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:14:04 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B095A45DE4D for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:14:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5F145DE53 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:14:02 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1BE1DB8043 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:14:01 +0900 (JST) Received: from m108.s.css.fujitsu.com (m108.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.108]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B871DB8041 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:14:00 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] memcg: mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() doesn't need sc.nodemask In-Reply-To: <20100722044911.GK14369@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20100716191334.736F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100722044911.GK14369@balbir.in.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20100723141111.88A8.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:14:00 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Nishimura Daisuke List-ID: > * KOSAKI Motohiro [2010-07-16 19:14:15]: > > > Currently mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() call shrink_zone() directly. > > thus it doesn't need to initialize sc.nodemask. shrink_zone() doesn't > > use it at all. > > > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro > > --- > > include/linux/swap.h | 3 +-- > > mm/memcontrol.c | 3 +-- > > mm/vmscan.c | 8 ++------ > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h > > index ff4acea..bf4eb62 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/swap.h > > +++ b/include/linux/swap.h > > @@ -244,8 +244,7 @@ extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem, > > extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem, > > gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap, > > unsigned int swappiness, > > - struct zone *zone, > > - int nid); > > + struct zone *zone); > > extern int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode, int file); > > extern unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_pages); > > extern int vm_swappiness; > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > > index aba4310..01f38ff 100644 > > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > > @@ -1307,8 +1307,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem, > > /* we use swappiness of local cgroup */ > > if (check_soft) > > ret = mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(victim, gfp_mask, > > - noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone, > > - zone->zone_pgdat->node_id); > > + noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone); > > else > > ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(victim, gfp_mask, > > noswap, get_swappiness(victim)); > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > > index bd1d035..be860a0 100644 > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > > @@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order, > > unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem, > > gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap, > > unsigned int swappiness, > > - struct zone *zone, int nid) > > + struct zone *zone) > > { > > struct scan_control sc = { > > .nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, > > @@ -1940,13 +1940,9 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem, > > .order = 0, > > .mem_cgroup = mem, > > }; > > - nodemask_t nm = nodemask_of_node(nid); > > - > > sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) | > > (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK); > > - sc.nodemask = &nm; > > - sc.nr_reclaimed = 0; > > - sc.nr_scanned = 0; > > We need the initialization to 0, is there a reason why it was removed? please reread C spec and other scan_control user. sc_nr_* were already initialized in struct scan_control sc = { } line. > What happens when we compare or increment sc.nr_*? > > Can we keep this indepedent of the tracing patches? > > > + > > /* > > * NOTE: Although we can get the priority field, using it > > * here is not a good idea, since it limits the pages we can scan. > > -- > > 1.6.5.2 > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > > Don't email: email@kvack.org > > -- > Three Cheers, > Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org