From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06A96B024D for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:34:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Andreas Gruenbacher Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:34:46 +0200 References: <4C425273.5000702@gmail.com> <201007192039.06670.agruen@suse.de> <4C45BD34.8030905@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4C45BD34.8030905@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007201834.46593.agruen@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Eric Sandeen , Wang Sheng-Hui Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4 , kernel-janitors List-ID: On Tuesday 20 July 2010 17:13:56 Eric Sandeen wrote: > I think the logic in the mbcache shrinker is fine. Indeed yes, I got confused, sorry. On Sunday 18 July 2010 08:36:59 Wang Sheng-Hui wrote: > I regenerated the patch. Please check it. Sheng-Hui, the mb_cache_lru_list list is now accessed without holding mb_cache_spinlock. Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org