From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail191.messagelabs.com (mail191.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE7096B02A3 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:26:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:25:21 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR Message-ID: <20100714142521.GA19289@fancy-poultry.org> References: <20100709190706.938177313@quilx.com> <20100710195621.GA13720@fancy-poultry.org> <20100712163900.GA8513@fancy-poultry.org> <20100713135650.GA6444@fancy-poultry.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Tejun Heo , Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin , David Rientjes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 14.07.2010, Christoph Lameter wrote: > I dont see anything in there at first glance that would cause slub to > increase its percpu usage. This is straight upstream? Yes ,it's plain vanilla 2.6.35-rc4/-rc5 from kernel.org. > Try to just comment out the BUILD_BUG_ON. I first bumped it up to 24k, but that was obviously not enough, so I commented out the BUILD_BUG_ON which triggers the build error. Now It builds fine, and I'll do some testing. Thanks, Heinz. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org