From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D0A6B0246 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 02:46:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 15:44:44 +0900 From: Naoya Horiguchi Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] hugetlb: hugepage migration core Message-ID: <20100707064444.GB21962@spritzera.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> References: <1278049646-29769-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <1278049646-29769-7-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <20100705095927.GC8510@basil.fritz.box> <20100706033342.GA10626@spritzera.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Wu Fengguang , Jun'ichi Nomura , linux-mm , LKML List-ID: On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:02:04AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2010, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > > Hmm, this chunk need to be fixed because I had too specific assumption. > > The list passed to migrate_pages() has only one page or one hugepage in > > page migration kicked by soft offline, but it's not the case in general case. > > Since hugepage is not linked to LRU list, we had better simply skip > > putback_lru_pages(). > > Maybe write a migrate_huge_page() function instead? The functionality is > materially different since we are not juggling things with the lru. OK. I'll try to devide functions for hugepage in the next turn. Thanks, Naoya Horiguchi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org