From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] oom: multi threaded process coredump don't make deadlock
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:34:06 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100630183322.AA68.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100630172430.AA42.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Oleg pointed out current PF_EXITING check is wrong. Because PF_EXITING
is per-thread flag, not per-process flag. He said,
Two threads, group-leader L and its sub-thread T. T dumps the code.
In this case both threads have ->mm != NULL, L has PF_EXITING.
The first problem is, select_bad_process() always return -1 in this
case (even if the caller is T, this doesn't matter).
The second problem is that we should add TIF_MEMDIE to T, not L.
I think we can remove this dubious PF_EXITING check. but as first step,
This patch add the protection of multi threaded issue.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 0858b18..b04e557 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints,
* the process of exiting and releasing its resources.
* Otherwise we could get an easy OOM deadlock.
*/
- if ((p->flags & PF_EXITING) && p->mm) {
+ if (thread_group_empty(p) && (p->flags & PF_EXITING) && p->mm) {
if (p != current)
return ERR_PTR(-1UL);
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-30 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 9:25 [mmotm 0611][PATCH 00/11] various OOM bugfixes v3 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 9:27 ` [PATCH 01/11] oom: don't try to kill oom_unkillable child KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 9:27 ` [PATCH 02/11] oom: oom_kill_process() doesn't select kthread child KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 13:55 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-01 0:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-01 13:38 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-30 9:28 ` [PATCH 03/11] oom: make oom_unkillable_task() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 14:19 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-01 0:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 9:29 ` [PATCH 04/11] oom: oom_kill_process() need to check p is unkillable KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 13:57 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-30 9:30 ` [PATCH 05/11] oom: /proc/<pid>/oom_score treat kernel thread honestly KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 14:03 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-01 0:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-01 14:36 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-30 9:31 ` [PATCH 06/11] oom: kill duplicate OOM_DISABLE check KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 14:10 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-30 9:31 ` [PATCH 07/11] oom: move OOM_DISABLE check from oom_kill_task to out_of_memory() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 14:20 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-01 0:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 9:32 ` [PATCH 08/11] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 9:32 ` [PATCH 09/11] oom: remove child->mm check from oom_kill_process() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 14:30 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-30 9:33 ` [PATCH 10/11] oom: give the dying task a higher priority KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 9:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-30 14:40 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-02 21:49 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-06 0:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-06 0:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] security: add const to security_task_setscheduler() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-06 0:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: make sched_param arugment static variables in some sched_setscheduler() caller KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-06 22:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-07-06 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-06 23:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-07-07 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-07 19:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-30 9:34 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100630183322.AA68.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox