From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 440126B01C1 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:27:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.74]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o5U9RHQf007254 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:27:17 +0900 Received: from smail (m4 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F340445DE6E for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:27:16 +0900 (JST) Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.94]) by m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C8F45DE60 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:27:16 +0900 (JST) Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECC31DB803A for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:27:16 +0900 (JST) Received: from m105.s.css.fujitsu.com (m105.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.105]) by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF821DB8037 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:27:16 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: [PATCH 01/11] oom: don't try to kill oom_unkillable child In-Reply-To: <20100630172430.AA42.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20100630172430.AA42.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20100630182621.AA48.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:27:15 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Minchan Kim , David Rientjes , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com List-ID: Now, badness() doesn't care neigher CPUSET nor mempolicy. Then if the victim child process have disjoint nodemask, OOM Killer might kill innocent process. This patch fixes it. Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro --- mm/oom_kill.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index 26ae697..0aeacb2 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int oom_kill_task(struct task_struct *p) static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order, unsigned long points, struct mem_cgroup *mem, - const char *message) + nodemask_t *nodemask, const char *message) { struct task_struct *victim = p; struct task_struct *child; @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order, continue; if (mem && !task_in_mem_cgroup(child, mem)) continue; + if (!has_intersects_mems_allowed(child, nodemask)) + continue; /* badness() returns 0 if the thread is unkillable */ child_points = badness(child, uptime.tv_sec); @@ -519,7 +521,7 @@ retry: if (!p || PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL) goto out; - if (oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, 0, points, mem, + if (oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, 0, points, mem, NULL, "Memory cgroup out of memory")) goto retry; out: @@ -678,7 +680,7 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask, * non-zero, current could not be killed so we must fallback to * the tasklist scan. */ - if (!oom_kill_process(current, gfp_mask, order, 0, NULL, + if (!oom_kill_process(current, gfp_mask, order, 0, NULL, nodemask, "Out of memory (oom_kill_allocating_task)")) return; } @@ -697,7 +699,7 @@ retry: panic("Out of memory and no killable processes...\n"); } - if (oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, order, points, NULL, + if (oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, order, points, NULL, nodemask, "Out of memory")) goto retry; read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); -- 1.6.5.2 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org