linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: recalculate lru_pages on each priority
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:34:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100627113422.GA14504@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100625181221.805A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 06:13:20PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> shrink_zones() need relatively long time. and lru_pages can be
> changed dramatically while shrink_zones().
> then, lru_pages need recalculate on each priority.

In the direct reclaim path, we bail out of that loop after
SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX reclaimed pages, so in this case, decreasing priority
levels actually mean we do _not_ make any progress and the total
number of lru pages should not change (much).  The possible distortion
in shrink_slab() is small.

However, for the suspend-to-disk case the reclaim target can be a lot
higher and we inevitably end up at higher priorities even though we
make progress, but fail to increase pressure on the shrinkers as well
without your patch.

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-27 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-25  9:13 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-25 14:15 ` Rik van Riel
2010-06-26 23:33 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-27 11:34 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2010-06-28  1:39   ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100627113422.GA14504@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox