linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] use find_lock_task_mm in memory cgroups oom
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:24:50 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100615152450.f82c1f8c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)


based on  oom-introduce-find_lock_task_mm-to-fix-mm-false-positives.patch
tested on mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2010-06-11-16-40.

==
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

When the OOM killer scans task, it check a task is under memcg or
not when it's called via memcg's context.

But, as Oleg pointed out, a thread group leader may have NULL ->mm
and task_in_mem_cgroup() may do wrong decision. We have to use
find_lock_task_mm() in memcg as generic OOM-Killer does.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/linux/oom.h |    2 ++
 mm/memcontrol.c     |   10 +++++++---
 mm/oom_kill.c       |    8 ++++++--
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0611/include/linux/oom.h
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0611.orig/include/linux/oom.h
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0611/include/linux/oom.h
@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ static inline void oom_killer_enable(voi
 	oom_killer_disabled = false;
 }
 
+extern struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p);
+
 /* sysctls */
 extern int sysctl_oom_dump_tasks;
 extern int sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task;
Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0611/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0611.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0611/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
 #include <linux/mm_inline.h>
 #include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/oom.h>
 #include "internal.h"
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -838,10 +839,13 @@ int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struc
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct mem_cgroup *curr = NULL;
+	struct task_struct *p;
 
-	task_lock(task);
-	curr = try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(task->mm);
-	task_unlock(task);
+	p = find_lock_task_mm(task);
+	if (!p)
+		return 0;
+	curr = try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(p->mm);
+	task_unlock(p);
 	if (!curr)
 		return 0;
 	/*
Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0611/mm/oom_kill.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0611.orig/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0611/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -81,13 +81,17 @@ static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
 
-/*
+/**
+ * find_lock_task_mm - Checking a process which a task belongs to has valid mm
+ * and return a locked task which has a valid pointer to mm.
+ *
+ * @p: the task of a process to be checked.
  * The process p may have detached its own ->mm while exiting or through
  * use_mm(), but one or more of its subthreads may still have a valid
  * pointer.  Return p, or any of its subthreads with a valid ->mm, with
  * task_lock() held.
  */
-static struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
+struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct task_struct *t = p;
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2010-06-15  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-15  6:24 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2010-06-15  9:59 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-16  0:03   ` [PATCH] use find_lock_task_mm in memory cgroups oom v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-16  4:42     ` Balbir Singh
2010-06-16  4:51       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100615152450.f82c1f8c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox