From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail191.messagelabs.com (mail191.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37D456B01B5 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 07:24:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o5DBOvpQ021763 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:24:57 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0D545DE50 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:24:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95AD45DE4D for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:24:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804C41DB8038 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:24:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from m106.s.css.fujitsu.com (m106.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.106]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2F71DB803E for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:24:56 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [patch 07/18] oom: filter tasks not sharing the same cpuset In-Reply-To: <20100608122740.8f045c78.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20100608122740.8f045c78.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-Id: <20100613201257.6199.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:24:55 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, David Rientjes , Rik van Riel , Nick Piggin , Oleg Nesterov , Balbir Singh , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Sorry for the delay. > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:51:32 -0700 (PDT) > David Rientjes wrote: > > > Andrew, are you the maintainer for these fixes or is KOSAKI? > > I am, thanks. Kosaki-san, you're making this harder than it should be. > Please either ack David's patches or promptly work with him on > finalising them. Thanks, Andrew, David. I agree with you. I don't find any end users harm and regressions in latest David's patch series. So, I'm glad to join his work. Unfortunatelly, I don't have enough time now. then, I expect my next review is not quite soon. but I'll promise I'll do. thanks. > > I realise that you have additional oom-killer patches but it's too > complex to try to work on two patch series concurrently. So let's > concentrate on get David's work sorted out and merged and then please > rebase yours on the result. > > I certainly don't have the time or inclination to go through two > patchsets and work out what the similarities and differences are so > I'll be concentrating on David's ones first. The order in which we > do this doesn't really matter. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org