linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@uudg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed
Date: Tue,  8 Jun 2010 20:41:51 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100607083650.8736.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100603152653.726B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

> From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> 
> It's possible to livelock the page allocator if a thread has
> mm->mmap_sem and fails to make forward progress because the
> oom killer selects another thread sharing the same ->mm to
> kill that cannot exit until the semaphore is dropped.
> 
> The oom killer will not kill multiple tasks at the same time; each oom
> killed task must exit before another task may be killed.  Thus, if one
> thread is holding mm->mmap_sem and cannot allocate memory, all threads
> sharing the same ->mm are blocked from exiting as well.  In the oom kill
> case, that means the thread holding mm->mmap_sem will never free
> additional memory since it cannot get access to memory reserves and the
> thread that depends on it with access to memory reserves cannot exit
> because it cannot acquire the semaphore.  Thus, the page allocators
> livelocks.
> 
> When the oom killer is called and current happens to have a pending
> SIGKILL, this patch automatically gives it access to memory reserves and
> returns.  Upon returning to the page allocator, its allocation will
> hopefully succeed so it can quickly exit and free its memory.  If not,
> the page allocator will fail the allocation if it is not __GFP_NOFAIL.
> 
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mm/oom_kill.c |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 67b5fa5..ad85e1b 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -638,6 +638,16 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> +	 * If current has a pending SIGKILL, then automatically select it.  The
> +	 * goal is to allow it to allocate so that it may quickly exit and free
> +	 * its memory.
> +	 */
> +	if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
> +		set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_MEMDIE);
> +		return;
> +	}

Self NAK this.
We have no gurantee that current is oom killable. Oh, here is
out_of_memory(), sigh.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-08 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-03  5:48 [mmotm 0521][PATCH 0/12] various OOM fixes for 2.6.35 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:49 ` [PATCH 01/12] oom: select_bad_process: check PF_KTHREAD instead of !mm to skip kthreads KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:50 ` [PATCH 02/12] oom: introduce find_lock_task_mm() to fix !mm false positives KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:12   ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  6:52     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] oom: the points calculation of child processes must use find_lock_task_mm() too KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:20   ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  5:52 ` [PATCH 04/12] oom: __oom_kill_task() " KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:53 ` [PATCH 05/12] oom: make oom_unkillable() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:11 ` [mmotm 0521][PATCH 0/12] various OOM fixes for 2.6.35 Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  6:23 ` [PATCH 06/12] oom: remove warning for in mm-less task __oom_kill_process() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:31   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03  6:37   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03  6:23 ` [PATCH 07/12] oom: Fix child process iteration properly KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:33   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03  6:24 ` [PATCH 08/12] oom: dump_tasks() use find_lock_task_mm() too KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:34   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03 15:21   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 15:26   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 20:12     ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 22:01       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 23:18         ` David Rientjes
2010-06-04 10:54     ` [PATCH 13/12] oom: dump_header() need tasklist_lock KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] oom: remove PF_EXITING check completely KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:34   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 14:00     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 20:26       ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 22:11         ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 23:23           ` David Rientjes
2010-06-04 10:04             ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-04 10:54     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:36   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03  6:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] oom: sacrifice child with highest badness score for parent KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] oom: remove special handling for pagefault ooms KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:27 ` [PATCH 12/12] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-08 11:41   ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-06-08 18:26     ` David Rientjes
2010-06-08 11:41 ` [mmotm 0521][PATCH 0/12] various OOM fixes for 2.6.35 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-08 11:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100607083650.8736.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lclaudio@uudg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox