From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@uudg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] oom: make oom_unkillable() helper function
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:53:29 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100603145221.7256.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100603135106.7247.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Now, sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task case and CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY
case don't call select_bad_process(). then, oom_kill_process() need
very similar unkillable tasks.
This patch unify it.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 79845f4..618cf44 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -250,6 +250,21 @@ static enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct zonelist *zonelist,
}
#endif
+static int oom_unkillable(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+ /* skip the init task and kthreads */
+ if (is_global_init(p) || (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+ return 1;
+
+ if (mem && !task_in_mem_cgroup(p, mem))
+ return 1;
+
+ if (p->signal->oom_adj == OOM_DISABLE)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Simple selection loop. We chose the process with the highest
* number of 'points'. We expect the caller will lock the tasklist.
@@ -268,10 +283,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints,
for_each_process(p) {
unsigned long points;
- /* skip the init task and kthreads */
- if (is_global_init(p) || (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
- continue;
- if (mem && !task_in_mem_cgroup(p, mem))
+ if (oom_unkillable(p, mem))
continue;
/*
@@ -304,9 +316,6 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints,
*ppoints = ULONG_MAX;
}
- if (p->signal->oom_adj == OOM_DISABLE)
- continue;
-
points = badness(p, uptime.tv_sec);
if (points > *ppoints || !chosen) {
chosen = p;
@@ -386,20 +395,18 @@ static void dump_header(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
* flag though it's unlikely that we select a process with CAP_SYS_RAW_IO
* set.
*/
-static void __oom_kill_task(struct task_struct *p, int verbose)
+static int __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
+ int verbose)
{
- if (is_global_init(p)) {
- WARN_ON(1);
- printk(KERN_WARNING "tried to kill init!\n");
- return;
- }
+ if (oom_unkillable(p, mem))
+ return 1;
p = find_lock_task_mm(p);
if (!p) {
WARN_ON(1);
printk(KERN_WARNING "tried to kill an mm-less task %d (%s)!\n",
task_pid_nr(p), p->comm);
- return;
+ return 1;
}
if (verbose)
@@ -420,22 +427,6 @@ static void __oom_kill_task(struct task_struct *p, int verbose)
set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
force_sig(SIGKILL, p);
-}
-
-static int oom_kill_task(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- /* WARNING: mm may not be dereferenced since we did not obtain its
- * value from get_task_mm(p). This is OK since all we need to do is
- * compare mm to q->mm below.
- *
- * Furthermore, even if mm contains a non-NULL value, p->mm may
- * change to NULL at any time since we do not hold task_lock(p).
- * However, this is of no concern to us.
- */
- if (!p->mm || p->signal->oom_adj == OOM_DISABLE)
- return 1;
-
- __oom_kill_task(p, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -454,7 +445,7 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
* its children or threads, just set TIF_MEMDIE so it can die quickly
*/
if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) {
- __oom_kill_task(p, 0);
+ __oom_kill_process(p, mem, 0);
return 0;
}
@@ -465,12 +456,13 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
list_for_each_entry(c, &p->children, sibling) {
if (c->mm == p->mm)
continue;
- if (mem && !task_in_mem_cgroup(c, mem))
- continue;
- if (!oom_kill_task(c))
+
+ /* Ok, Kill the child */
+ if (!__oom_kill_process(c, mem, 1))
return 0;
}
- return oom_kill_task(p);
+
+ return __oom_kill_process(p, mem, 1);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-03 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-03 5:48 [mmotm 0521][PATCH 0/12] various OOM fixes for 2.6.35 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 5:49 ` [PATCH 01/12] oom: select_bad_process: check PF_KTHREAD instead of !mm to skip kthreads KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 5:50 ` [PATCH 02/12] oom: introduce find_lock_task_mm() to fix !mm false positives KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 6:12 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03 6:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 5:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] oom: the points calculation of child processes must use find_lock_task_mm() too KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 6:20 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03 5:52 ` [PATCH 04/12] oom: __oom_kill_task() " KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 5:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-06-03 6:11 ` [mmotm 0521][PATCH 0/12] various OOM fixes for 2.6.35 Minchan Kim
2010-06-03 6:23 ` [PATCH 06/12] oom: remove warning for in mm-less task __oom_kill_process() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 6:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03 6:37 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 6:23 ` [PATCH 07/12] oom: Fix child process iteration properly KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 6:33 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03 6:24 ` [PATCH 08/12] oom: dump_tasks() use find_lock_task_mm() too KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 6:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03 15:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 15:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 20:12 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 22:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 23:18 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-04 10:54 ` [PATCH 13/12] oom: dump_header() need tasklist_lock KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 6:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] oom: remove PF_EXITING check completely KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 6:34 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 14:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 20:26 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 22:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 23:23 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-04 10:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-04 10:54 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 6:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03 6:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] oom: sacrifice child with highest badness score for parent KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 6:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] oom: remove special handling for pagefault ooms KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 6:27 ` [PATCH 12/12] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-08 11:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-08 18:26 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-08 11:41 ` [mmotm 0521][PATCH 0/12] various OOM fixes for 2.6.35 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-08 11:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100603145221.7256.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lclaudio@uudg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox