linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] oom: Fix child process iteration properly
Date: Wed,  2 Jun 2010 22:53:59 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100602200323.F515.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100601192726.GA19120@redhat.com>

> On 06/01, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >
> > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long points, cpu_time, run_time;
> >  	struct task_struct *c;
> > +	struct task_struct *t = p;
> 
> This initialization should be moved down to
> 
> > +	do {
> > +		list_for_each_entry(c, &t->children, sibling) {
> > +			child = find_lock_task_mm(c);
> > +			if (child) {
> > +				if (child->mm != p->mm)
> > +					points += child->mm->total_vm/2 + 1;
> > +				task_unlock(child);
> > +			}
> >  		}
> > -	}
> > +	} while_each_thread(p, t);
> 
> this loop. We have "p = find_lock_task_mm(p)" in between which can change p.
> 
> Apart from this, I think the whole series is nice.

Nich catch!

simple incremental patch is here.

========================================================
Subject: [PATCH] Fix oom: Fix child process iteration properly

p can be changed by find_lock_task_mm()

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/oom_kill.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 9631f1b..9e7f0f9 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime)
 {
 	unsigned long points, cpu_time, run_time;
 	struct task_struct *c;
-	struct task_struct *t = p;
+	struct task_struct *t;
 	struct task_struct *child;
 	int oom_adj = p->signal->oom_adj;
 	struct task_cputime task_time;
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime)
 	 * child is eating the vast majority of memory, adding only half
 	 * to the parents will make the child our kill candidate of choice.
 	 */
+	t = p;
 	do {
 		list_for_each_entry(c, &t->children, sibling) {
 			child = find_lock_task_mm(c);
-- 
1.6.5.2





--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-02 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-01  5:46 [PATCH 1/5] oom: make oom_unkillable() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-01  5:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] oom: remove warning for in mm-less task __oom_kill_process() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-01  7:20   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-01  5:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] oom: Fix child process iteration properly KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-01 19:27   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-02 13:53     ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-06-01  5:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] oom-kill: give the dying task a higher priority (v4) KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-01  5:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] oom: dump_tasks() use find_lock_task_mm() too KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-02 13:54   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-02 15:03   ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  0:06     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  0:32       ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  0:41         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  0:46           ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100602200323.F515.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox