linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm,migration: Fix race between shift_arg_pages and rmap_walk by guaranteeing rmap_walk finds PTEs created within the temporary stack
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 09:40:50 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100510094050.8cb79143.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005091245000.3711@i5.linux-foundation.org>

On Sun, 9 May 2010 12:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sun, 9 May 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > 
> > It turns out not to be easy to the preallocating of PUDs, PMDs and PTEs
> > move_page_tables() needs.  To avoid overallocating, it has to follow the same
> > logic as move_page_tables duplicating some code in the process. The ugliest
> > aspect of all is passing those pre-allocated pages back into move_page_tables
> > where they need to be passed down to such functions as __pte_alloc. It turns
> > extremely messy.
> 
> Umm. What?
> 
> That's crazy talk. I'm not talking about preallocating stuff in order to 
> pass it in to move_page_tables(). I'm talking about just _creating_ the 
> dang page tables early - preallocating them IN THE PROCESS VM SPACE.
> 
> IOW, a patch like this (this is a pseudo-patch, totally untested, won't 
> compile, yadda yadda - you need to actually make the people who call 
> "move_page_tables()" call that prepare function first etc etc)
> 
> Yeah, if we care about holes in the page tables, we can certainly copy 
> more of the move_page_tables() logic, but it certainly doesn't matter for 
> execve(). This just makes sure that the destination page tables exist 
> first.
> 
IMHO, I think move_page_tables() itself should be implemented as your patch.

But, move_page_tables()'s failure is not a big problem. At failure,
exec will abort and no page fault will occur later. What we have to do in
this migration-patch-series is avoding inconsistent update of sets of
[page, vma->vm_start, vma->pg_off, ptes] or "dont' migrate pages in exec's
statk".

Considering cost, as Mel shows, "don't migrate apges in exec's stack" seems
reasonable. But, I still doubt this check.

+static bool is_vma_temporary_stack(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	int maybe_stack = vma->vm_flags & (VM_GROWSDOWN | VM_GROWSUP);
+
+	if (!maybe_stack)
+		return false;
+
+	/* If only the stack is mapped, assume exec is in progress */
+	if (vma->vm_mm->map_count == 1) -------------------(*)
+		return true; 
+
+	return false;
+}
+
\
Mel, can (*) be safe even on a.out format (format other than ELFs) ?

Thanks,
-Kame







> 		Linus
> 
> ---
>  mm/mremap.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c
> index cde56ee..c14505c 100644
> --- a/mm/mremap.c
> +++ b/mm/mremap.c
> @@ -128,6 +128,26 @@ static void move_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *old_pmd,
>  
>  #define LATENCY_LIMIT	(64 * PAGE_SIZE)
>  
> +/*
> + * Preallocate the page tables, so that we can do the actual move
> + * without any allocations, and thus no error handling etc.
> + */
> +int prepare_move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +	unsigned long old_addr, struct vm_area_struct *new_vma,
> +	unsigned long new_addr, unsigned long len)
> +{
> +	unsigned long end_addr = new_addr + len;
> +
> +	while (new_addr < end_addr) {
> +		pmd_t *new_pmd;
> +		new_pmd = alloc_new_pmd(vma->vm_mm, new_addr);
> +		if (!new_pmd)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		new_addr = (new_addr + PMD_SIZE) & PMD_MASK;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		unsigned long old_addr, struct vm_area_struct *new_vma,
>  		unsigned long new_addr, unsigned long len)
> @@ -147,7 +167,7 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		old_pmd = get_old_pmd(vma->vm_mm, old_addr);
>  		if (!old_pmd)
>  			continue;
> -		new_pmd = alloc_new_pmd(vma->vm_mm, new_addr);
> +		new_pmd = get_old_pmd(vma->vm_mm, new_addr);
>  		if (!new_pmd)
>  			break;
>  		next = (new_addr + PMD_SIZE) & PMD_MASK;
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-10  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-06 23:20 [PATCH 0/2] Fix migration races in rmap_walk() V7 Mel Gorman
2010-05-06 23:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm,migration: Prevent rmap_walk_[anon|ksm] seeing the wrong VMA information Mel Gorman
2010-05-07  0:56   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-07 16:26     ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-08 15:39   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-08 17:02     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-08 18:04       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-08 19:51         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-09 19:23     ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-06 23:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,migration: Fix race between shift_arg_pages and rmap_walk by guaranteeing rmap_walk finds PTEs created within the temporary stack Mel Gorman
2010-05-07  1:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-07  1:57     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-07  2:12       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-07  4:19         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-07 14:18           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-09 19:21         ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-09 19:56           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-09 20:06             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-09 20:20               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-10  0:40             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2010-05-10  1:30               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-10  1:32                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-10  1:40                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-10  1:49                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-10 13:24                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-10 23:55                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-10  0:42             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-10 14:02               ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-10 13:49             ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-10  0:32           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-07  9:16     ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-07  8:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix migration races in rmap_walk() V7 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-06 15:33 [PATCH 0/2] Fix migration races in rmap_walk() V6 Mel Gorman
2010-05-06 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,migration: Fix race between shift_arg_pages and rmap_walk by guaranteeing rmap_walk finds PTEs created within the temporary stack Mel Gorman
2010-05-05 13:14 [PATCH 0/2] Fix migration races in rmap_walk() V5 Mel Gorman
2010-05-05 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,migration: Fix race between shift_arg_pages and rmap_walk by guaranteeing rmap_walk finds PTEs created within the temporary stack Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100510094050.8cb79143.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox