From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5141D6B01F4 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:33:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:32:42 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix migration races in rmap_walk() V2 Message-ID: <20100427223242.GG8860@random.random> References: <1272403852-10479-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Mel Gorman , Linux-MM , LKML , Minchan Kim , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:27:36PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Can we simply wait like in the fault path? There is no bug there, no need to wait either. I already audited it before, and I didn't see any bug. Unless you can show a bug with CPU A running the rmap_walk on process1 before process2, there is no bug to fix there. > > > Patch 3 notes that while a VMA is moved under the anon_vma lock, the page > > tables are not similarly protected. Where migration PTEs are > > encountered, they are cleaned up. > > This means they are copied / moved etc and "cleaned" up in a state when > the page was unlocked. Migration entries are not supposed to exist when > a page is not locked. patch 3 is real, and the first thought I had was to lock down the page before running vma_adjust and unlock after move_page_tables. But these are virtual addresses. Maybe there's a simpler way to keep migration away while we run those two operations. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org