From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EEEB6B01E3 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:29:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.75]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o3M7TWuw025789 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:29:32 +0900 Received: from smail (m5 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE15545DE51 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:29:31 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.95]) by m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0B145DE4F for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:29:31 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993C1E08001 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:29:31 +0900 (JST) Received: from m107.s.css.fujitsu.com (m107.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.107]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49409E08002 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:29:31 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:25:36 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [patch -mm] memcg: make oom killer a no-op when no killable task can be found Message-Id: <20100422162536.b904203e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20100422072319.GW5683@laptop> References: <20100407092050.48c8fc3d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100407205418.FB90.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100421121758.af52f6e0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100422072319.GW5683@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Nick Piggin Cc: Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , KOSAKI Motohiro , anfei , nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp, Balbir Singh , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:23:19 +1000 Nick Piggin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:17:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > fyi, I still consider these patches to be in the "stuck" state. So we > > need to get them unstuck. > > > > > > Hiroyuki (and anyone else): could you please summarise in the briefest > > way possible what your objections are to Daivd's oom-killer changes? > > > > I'll start: we don't change the kernel ABI. Ever. And when we _do_ > > change it we don't change it without warning. > > How is this turning into such a big issue? It is totally ridiculous. > It is not even a "cleanup". > > Just drop the ABI-changing patches, and I think the rest of them looked > OK, didn't they? > I agree with you. -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org