From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A330A6B01F2 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:25:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.76]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o2UAPUSi006872 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:25:31 +0900 Received: from smail (m6 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B444945DE4E for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:25:30 +0900 (JST) Received: from s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.96]) by m6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9412445DD70 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:25:30 +0900 (JST) Received: from s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CF1E38003 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:25:30 +0900 (JST) Received: from m107.s.css.fujitsu.com (m107.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.107]) by s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CDEE08004 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:25:30 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH]vmscan: handle underflow for get_scan_ratio In-Reply-To: <28c262361003300317g6df68fc6m4385cfbe3e8a1b04@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> <28c262361003300317g6df68fc6m4385cfbe3e8a1b04@mail.gmail.com> Message-Id: <20100330192219.328C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:25:29 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Minchan Kim Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Shaohua Li , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com List-ID: > Yes. It made subtle change. > But we should not depend that change. > Current logic seems to be good and clear than old. > I think you were lucky at that time by not-good and not-clear logic. > > BTW, How about this? Unfortunatelly, memcg need your removed code. if removed, swapping out might happen although sc->may_swap==0 when priority==0. Please give me little investigate time. > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 79c8098..f0df563 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -1646,11 +1646,6 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone, > int file = is_file_lru(l); > unsigned long scan; > > - if (percent[file] == 0) { > - nr[l] = 0; > - continue; > - } > - > scan = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, l); > if (priority) { > scan >>= priority; > > > > > -- > Kind regards, > Minchan Kim > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org