From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:30:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100325093006.cd0361e6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100324114056.GE21147@csn.ul.ie>
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:40:57 +0000
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:19:27AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:25:45 +0000
> > Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> >
> > > Ordinarily when a high-order allocation fails, direct reclaim is entered to
> > > free pages to satisfy the allocation. With this patch, it is determined if
> > > an allocation failed due to external fragmentation instead of low memory
> > > and if so, the calling process will compact until a suitable page is
> > > freed. Compaction by moving pages in memory is considerably cheaper than
> > > paging out to disk and works where there are locked pages or no swap. If
> > > compaction fails to free a page of a suitable size, then reclaim will
> > > still occur.
> > >
> > > Direct compaction returns as soon as possible. As each block is compacted,
> > > it is checked if a suitable page has been freed and if so, it returns.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> > > Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/compaction.h | 16 +++++-
> > > include/linux/vmstat.h | 1 +
> > > mm/compaction.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > mm/page_alloc.c | 26 ++++++++++
> > > mm/vmstat.c | 15 +++++-
> > > 5 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/compaction.h b/include/linux/compaction.h
> > > index c94890b..b851428 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/compaction.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/compaction.h
> > > @@ -1,14 +1,26 @@
> > > #ifndef _LINUX_COMPACTION_H
> > > #define _LINUX_COMPACTION_H
> > >
> > > -/* Return values for compact_zone() */
> > > +/* Return values for compact_zone() and try_to_compact_pages() */
> > > #define COMPACT_INCOMPLETE 0
> > > -#define COMPACT_COMPLETE 1
> > > +#define COMPACT_PARTIAL 1
> > > +#define COMPACT_COMPLETE 2
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
> > > extern int sysctl_compact_memory;
> > > extern int sysctl_compaction_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> > > void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos);
> > > +
> > > +extern int fragmentation_index(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order);
> > > +extern unsigned long try_to_compact_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
> > > + int order, gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *mask);
> > > +#else
> > > +static inline unsigned long try_to_compact_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
> > > + int order, gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> > > +{
> > > + return COMPACT_INCOMPLETE;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
> > >
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && defined(CONFIG_SYSFS) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/vmstat.h b/include/linux/vmstat.h
> > > index 56e4b44..b4b4d34 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/vmstat.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/vmstat.h
> > > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ enum vm_event_item { PGPGIN, PGPGOUT, PSWPIN, PSWPOUT,
> > > KSWAPD_SKIP_CONGESTION_WAIT,
> > > PAGEOUTRUN, ALLOCSTALL, PGROTATED,
> > > COMPACTBLOCKS, COMPACTPAGES, COMPACTPAGEFAILED,
> > > + COMPACTSTALL, COMPACTFAIL, COMPACTSUCCESS,
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> > > HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC, HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC_FAIL,
> > > #endif
> > > diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> > > index 8df6e3d..6688700 100644
> > > --- a/mm/compaction.c
> > > +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> > > @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ struct compact_control {
> > > unsigned long nr_anon;
> > > unsigned long nr_file;
> > >
> > > + unsigned int order; /* order a direct compactor needs */
> > > + int migratetype; /* MOVABLE, RECLAIMABLE etc */
> > > struct zone *zone;
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -301,10 +303,31 @@ static void update_nr_listpages(struct compact_control *cc)
> > > static inline int compact_finished(struct zone *zone,
> > > struct compact_control *cc)
> > > {
> > > + unsigned int order;
> > > + unsigned long watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone) + (1 << cc->order);
> > > +
> > > /* Compaction run completes if the migrate and free scanner meet */
> > > if (cc->free_pfn <= cc->migrate_pfn)
> > > return COMPACT_COMPLETE;
> > >
> > > + /* Compaction run is not finished if the watermark is not met */
> > > + if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, cc->order, watermark, 0, 0))
> > > + return COMPACT_INCOMPLETE;
> > > +
> > > + if (cc->order == -1)
> > > + return COMPACT_INCOMPLETE;
> > > +
> > > + /* Direct compactor: Is a suitable page free? */
> > > + for (order = cc->order; order < MAX_ORDER; order++) {
> > > + /* Job done if page is free of the right migratetype */
> > > + if (!list_empty(&zone->free_area[order].free_list[cc->migratetype]))
> > > + return COMPACT_PARTIAL;
> > > +
> > > + /* Job done if allocation would set block type */
> > > + if (order >= pageblock_order && zone->free_area[order].nr_free)
> > > + return COMPACT_PARTIAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > return COMPACT_INCOMPLETE;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -348,6 +371,101 @@ static int compact_zone(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline unsigned long compact_zone_order(struct zone *zone,
> > > + int order, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > > +{
> > > + struct compact_control cc = {
> > > + .nr_freepages = 0,
> > > + .nr_migratepages = 0,
> > > + .order = order,
> > > + .migratetype = allocflags_to_migratetype(gfp_mask),
> > > + .zone = zone,
> > > + };
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc.freepages);
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc.migratepages);
> > > +
> > > + return compact_zone(zone, &cc);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * try_to_compact_pages - Direct compact to satisfy a high-order allocation
> > > + * @zonelist: The zonelist used for the current allocation
> > > + * @order: The order of the current allocation
> > > + * @gfp_mask: The GFP mask of the current allocation
> > > + * @nodemask: The allowed nodes to allocate from
> > > + *
> > > + * This is the main entry point for direct page compaction.
> > > + */
> > > +unsigned long try_to_compact_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
> > > + int order, gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> > > +{
> > > + enum zone_type high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask);
> > > + int may_enter_fs = gfp_mask & __GFP_FS;
> > > + int may_perform_io = gfp_mask & __GFP_IO;
> > > + unsigned long watermark;
> > > + struct zoneref *z;
> > > + struct zone *zone;
> > > + int rc = COMPACT_INCOMPLETE;
> > > +
> > > + /* Check whether it is worth even starting compaction */
> > > + if (order == 0 || !may_enter_fs || !may_perform_io)
> > > + return rc;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * We will not stall if the necessary conditions are not met for
> > > + * migration but direct reclaim seems to account stalls similarly
> > > + */
> > > + count_vm_event(COMPACTSTALL);
> > > +
> > > + /* Compact each zone in the list */
> > > + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx,
> > > + nodemask) {
> > > + int fragindex;
> > > + int status;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Watermarks for order-0 must be met for compaction. Note
> > > + * the 2UL. This is because during migration, copies of
> > > + * pages need to be allocated and for a short time, the
> > > + * footprint is higher
> > > + */
> > > + watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone) + (2UL << order);
> > > + if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, 0))
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * fragmentation index determines if allocation failures are
> > > + * due to low memory or external fragmentation
> > > + *
> > > + * index of -1 implies allocations might succeed depending
> > > + * on watermarks
> > > + * index < 500 implies alloc failure is due to lack of memory
> > > + *
> > > + * XXX: The choice of 500 is arbitrary. Reinvestigate
> > > + * appropriately to determine a sensible default.
> > > + * and what it means when watermarks are also taken
> > > + * into account. Consider making it a sysctl
> > > + */
> > > + fragindex = fragmentation_index(zone, order);
> > > + if (fragindex >= 0 && fragindex <= 500)
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + if (fragindex == -1 && zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, watermark, 0, 0)) {
> > > + rc = COMPACT_PARTIAL;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + status = compact_zone_order(zone, order, gfp_mask);
> > > + rc = max(status, rc);
> >
> > Hm...then, scanning over the whole zone until success of migration at
> > each failure?
>
> Sorry for my lack of understanding but your question is difficult to
> understand.
>
Thank you for clarification.
My word was bad. (And my understanding was.)
> You might mean "scanning over the whole zonelist" rather than zone. In that
> case, the zone_watermark_ok before and after the compaction will exit the
> loop rather than moving to the next zone in the list.
>
Yes.
> I'm not sure what you mean by "at each failure". The worst-case scenario
> is that a process compacts the entire zone and still fails to meet the
> watermarks. The best-case scenario is that it does a small amount of
> compaction in the compact_zone() loop and finds that compact_finished()
> causes the loop to exit before the whole zone is compacted.
>
"at each failure" means "At each fauilure of smooth allocation of contiguous
pages of requested order", I'm sorry for short words.
And yes, compact_finished() causes the loop to exit in good cases.
(And I missed a change in compact_finished() in this patch..)
> > Is it meaningful that multiple tasks run direct-compaction against
> > a zone (from zone->start_pfn to zone->end_pfn) in parallel ?
> > ex) running order=3 compaction while other thread runs order=5 compaction.
> >
>
> It is meaningful in that "it will work" but there is a good chance that it's
> pointless. To what degree it's pointless depends on what happened between
> Compaction Process A starting and Compaction Process B. If kswapd is also
> awake, then it might be worthwhile. By and large, the scanning is fast enough
> that it won't be very noticeable.
>
Hmm.
> My feeling is that multiple processes entering compaction at all is a bad
> situation to be in. It implies there are multiple processes are requiring
> high-order pages. Maybe if transparent huge pages were merged, it'd be
> expected but otherwise it'd be a surprise.
>
At first look, my concern was that you use
if (order)
rather than
if (order >= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
if order=1, dropping _old_ file cache isn't very bad.
Because migration modifies LRU order, frequent compaction may add too much
noise to LRU.
But yes, I have no data.
> > Can't we find a clever way to find [start_pfn, end_pfn) for scanning rather than
> > [zone->start_pfn, zone->start_pfn + zone->spanned_pages) ?
> >
>
> For sure. An early iteration of these patches stored the PFNs last scanned
> for migration in struct zone and would use that as a starting point. It'd
> wrap around at least once when it encountered the free page scanner so
> that the zone would be scanned at least once. A more convulated
> iteration stored a list of compactors in a linked list. When selecting a
> pageblock to migrate pages from, it'd check the list and avoid scanning
> the same block as any other process.
>
> I dropped these modifications for a few reasons
>
> a) It added complexity for a situation that may not be encountered in
> practice.
> b) Arguably, it would also make sense to simply allow only one compactor
> within a zone at a time and use a mutex
> c) I had no data on why multiple processes would be direct compacting
>
> The last point was the most important. I wanted to avoid complexity unless
> there was a good reason for it. If we do encounter a situation where
> multiple compactors are causing problems, I'd be more likely to ask "why
> are there so many high-order allocations happening simultaneously?" than
> "how can we make compaction smarter?"
>
I agree multiple requester of "high order" is unusual. Here, "high order" means
order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER.
But multiple requester of order=1,2,3? is usual case, I think.
BTW, one more question.
Because freed pages are pushed back to buddy system by __free_page(page),
they may exists in zone's pcp list. In that case, compact_finished() can't
find there is a free chunk and do more work.
How about using a function like
free_pcppages_bulk(zone, pcp->batch, pcp);
to bypass pcp list and freeing pages at once ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-25 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-23 12:25 [PATCH 0/11] Memory Compaction v5 Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm,migration: Take a reference to the anon_vma before migrating Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm,migration: Do not try to migrate unmapped anonymous pages Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 17:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:04 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm: Share the anon_vma ref counts between KSM and page migration Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 17:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 23:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 04/11] Allow CONFIG_MIGRATION to be set without CONFIG_NUMA or memory hot-remove Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 05/11] Export unusable free space index via /proc/unusable_index Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 17:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:14 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 0:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-24 0:16 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 0:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-24 10:25 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 06/11] Export fragmentation index via /proc/extfrag_index Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 17:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 07/11] Memory compaction core Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 17:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:15 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 18:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:58 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 19:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-24 1:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-24 1:47 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 1:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-24 2:10 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 10:57 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-24 20:59 ` Jonathan Corbet
2010-03-24 21:14 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-24 21:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-24 21:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-24 21:28 ` Jonathan Corbet
2010-03-24 21:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-24 21:54 ` Jonathan Corbet
2010-03-24 22:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-24 21:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-25 9:13 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 08/11] Add /proc trigger for memory compaction Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 18:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:32 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-26 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 09/11] Add /sys trigger for per-node " Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 18:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 22:45 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 0:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 10/11] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 23:10 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 11:11 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 11:59 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 12:06 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 12:10 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 12:09 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 12:25 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 1:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-24 11:40 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 0:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2010-03-25 9:48 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 9:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-25 10:16 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-26 1:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-26 9:40 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-25 0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-25 10:21 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 11/11] Do not compact within a preferred zone after a compaction failure Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 18:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:39 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 19:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-24 10:37 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 19:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-24 20:53 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-25 9:40 ` Mel Gorman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-12 16:41 [PATCH 0/11] Memory Compaction v4 Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-03-16 2:47 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-19 6:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-19 6:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-19 10:10 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 11:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-19 10:09 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 11:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-25 15:11 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-26 6:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100325093006.cd0361e6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox