From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm v2 02/10] oom: sacrifice child with highest badness score for parent
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:24:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100302045413.GB3212@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002261550300.30830@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
* David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> [2010-02-26 15:53:05]:
> When a task is chosen for oom kill, the oom killer first attempts to
> sacrifice a child not sharing its parent's memory instead.
> Unfortunately, this often kills in a seemingly random fashion based on
> the ordering of the selected task's child list. Additionally, it is not
> guaranteed at all to free a large amount of memory that we need to
> prevent additional oom killing in the very near future.
>
> Instead, we now only attempt to sacrifice the worst child not sharing its
> parent's memory, if one exists. The worst child is indicated with the
> highest badness() score. This serves two advantages: we kill a
> memory-hogging task more often, and we allow the configurable
> /proc/pid/oom_adj value to be considered as a factor in which child to
> kill.
>
> Reviewers may observe that the previous implementation would iterate
> through the children and attempt to kill each until one was successful
> and then the parent if none were found while the new code simply kills
> the most memory-hogging task or the parent. Note that the only time
> oom_kill_task() fails, however, is when a child does not have an mm or
> has a /proc/pid/oom_adj of OOM_DISABLE. badness() returns 0 for both
> cases, so the final oom_kill_task() will always succeed.
>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
You've got too many of these already, here goes
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-02 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-26 23:52 [patch -mm v2 00/10] oom killer rewrite David Rientjes
2010-02-26 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 01/10] oom: filter tasks not sharing the same cpuset David Rientjes
2010-03-02 4:54 ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-26 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 02/10] oom: sacrifice child with highest badness score for parent David Rientjes
2010-03-02 4:54 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2010-02-26 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 03/10] oom: select task from tasklist for mempolicy ooms David Rientjes
2010-02-26 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 04/10] oom: remove special handling for pagefault ooms David Rientjes
2010-03-01 1:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-01 10:13 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-01 23:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-02 23:55 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-03 0:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-03 0:44 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-01 5:23 ` Balbir Singh
2010-03-01 10:04 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-01 23:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-03 0:01 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-03 0:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-03 0:38 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-03 0:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-03 0:53 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-03 0:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-03 23:27 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-04 3:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-04 6:50 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-04 7:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-04 9:50 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-05 0:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-02 2:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-02 23:59 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-26 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 05/10] oom: badness heuristic rewrite David Rientjes
2010-02-26 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 06/10] oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable David Rientjes
2010-02-26 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 07/10] oom: replace sysctls with quick mode David Rientjes
2010-02-26 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 08/10] oom: avoid oom killer for lowmem allocations David Rientjes
2010-02-26 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 09/10] oom: remove unnecessary code and cleanup David Rientjes
2010-02-26 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 10/10] oom: default to killing current for pagefault ooms David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100302045413.GB3212@balbir.in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox